Understanding the Impact of Generative AI on Professional Judgement

Sung Hwan Chai, Brian Nicholson, George Salijeni, Leonid Sokolovskyy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Published conference outputConference publication

Abstract

This paper examines how generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) reshapes professional judgement in accounting. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and 22 interviews at a mid-tier UK accounting firm, we analyse everyday practices through the ICAS (2016) Professional Judgement Framework. Our findings reveal three distinct modes associated with the emerging impact of ChatGPT in accounting and auditing: Gen AI as a sparring partner, the emergence of AI-mediated feedback loops, and encroachment of Gen AI on human judgement. Drawing on Scott & Orlikowski (2025), we argue that professional judgement emerges as a sociomaterial phenomenon “in-the-making,” continually co-constituted through human–AI interactions. The study contributes to debates on automation, augmentation, and the future of expertise by foregrounding how Gen AI reconfigures judgement as a situated practice.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationICIS 2025 Proceedings
Volume19
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the Impact of Generative AI on Professional Judgement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this