What difference doguidelines make? An observational study of online-questionnaire design guidelines put to practical use

Jo Lumsden, Scott Flinn, Michelle Anderson, Wendy Morgan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

As a new medium for questionnaire delivery, the Internet has the potential to revolutionize the survey process. Online-questionnaires can provide many capabilities not found in traditional paper-based questionnaires. Despite this, and the introduction of a plethora of tools to support online-questionnaire creation, current electronic survey design typically replicates the look-and-feel of paper-based questionnaires, thus failing to harness the full power of the electronic delivery medium. A recent environmental scan of online-questionnaire design tools found that little, if any, support is incorporated within these tools to guide questionnaire designers according to best-practice [Lumsden & Morgan 2005]. This paper briefly introduces a comprehensive set of guidelines for the design of online-questionnaires. Drawn from relevant disparate sources, all the guidelines incorporated within the set are proven in their own right; as an initial assessment of the value of the set of guidelines as a practical reference guide, we undertook an informal study to observe the effect of introducing the guidelines into the design process for a complex online-questionnaire. The paper discusses the qualitative findings — which are encouraging for the role of the guidelines in the ‘bigger picture’ of online survey delivery across many domains such as e-government, e-business, and e-health — of this case study.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPeople and computers XIX — the bigger picture
Subtitle of host publicationproceedings of HCI 2005
EditorsTom McEwan, Jan Gulliksen, David Benyon
Place of PublicationLondon (UK)
PublisherSpringer
Pages69-83
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-84628-249-2
ISBN (Print)978-1-84628-192-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Event19th Annual Conference of the British Human-Computer Interaction Group - Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Duration: 5 Sep 20059 Sep 2005

Conference

Conference19th Annual Conference of the British Human-Computer Interaction Group
Abbreviated titleHCI 2005
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityEdinburgh
Period5/09/059/09/05

Fingerprint

Health
Internet
Industry

Keywords

  • online-questionnaire
  • design guidelines
  • evaluative case study

Cite this

Lumsden, J., Flinn, S., Anderson, M., & Morgan, W. (2006). What difference doguidelines make? An observational study of online-questionnaire design guidelines put to practical use. In T. McEwan, J. Gulliksen, & D. Benyon (Eds.), People and computers XIX — the bigger picture: proceedings of HCI 2005 (pp. 69-83). London (UK): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_5
Lumsden, Jo ; Flinn, Scott ; Anderson, Michelle ; Morgan, Wendy. / What difference doguidelines make? An observational study of online-questionnaire design guidelines put to practical use. People and computers XIX — the bigger picture: proceedings of HCI 2005. editor / Tom McEwan ; Jan Gulliksen ; David Benyon. London (UK) : Springer, 2006. pp. 69-83
@inproceedings{3b030b4c63f44037b62140c23bfb8910,
title = "What difference doguidelines make? An observational study of online-questionnaire design guidelines put to practical use",
abstract = "As a new medium for questionnaire delivery, the Internet has the potential to revolutionize the survey process. Online-questionnaires can provide many capabilities not found in traditional paper-based questionnaires. Despite this, and the introduction of a plethora of tools to support online-questionnaire creation, current electronic survey design typically replicates the look-and-feel of paper-based questionnaires, thus failing to harness the full power of the electronic delivery medium. A recent environmental scan of online-questionnaire design tools found that little, if any, support is incorporated within these tools to guide questionnaire designers according to best-practice [Lumsden & Morgan 2005]. This paper briefly introduces a comprehensive set of guidelines for the design of online-questionnaires. Drawn from relevant disparate sources, all the guidelines incorporated within the set are proven in their own right; as an initial assessment of the value of the set of guidelines as a practical reference guide, we undertook an informal study to observe the effect of introducing the guidelines into the design process for a complex online-questionnaire. The paper discusses the qualitative findings — which are encouraging for the role of the guidelines in the ‘bigger picture’ of online survey delivery across many domains such as e-government, e-business, and e-health — of this case study.",
keywords = "online-questionnaire, design guidelines, evaluative case study",
author = "Jo Lumsden and Scott Flinn and Michelle Anderson and Wendy Morgan",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1007/1-84628-249-7_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-84628-192-1",
pages = "69--83",
editor = "Tom McEwan and Jan Gulliksen and David Benyon",
booktitle = "People and computers XIX — the bigger picture",
publisher = "Springer",
address = "Germany",

}

Lumsden, J, Flinn, S, Anderson, M & Morgan, W 2006, What difference doguidelines make? An observational study of online-questionnaire design guidelines put to practical use. in T McEwan, J Gulliksen & D Benyon (eds), People and computers XIX — the bigger picture: proceedings of HCI 2005. Springer, London (UK), pp. 69-83, 19th Annual Conference of the British Human-Computer Interaction Group, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 5/09/05. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_5

What difference doguidelines make? An observational study of online-questionnaire design guidelines put to practical use. / Lumsden, Jo; Flinn, Scott; Anderson, Michelle; Morgan, Wendy.

People and computers XIX — the bigger picture: proceedings of HCI 2005. ed. / Tom McEwan; Jan Gulliksen; David Benyon. London (UK) : Springer, 2006. p. 69-83.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - What difference doguidelines make? An observational study of online-questionnaire design guidelines put to practical use

AU - Lumsden, Jo

AU - Flinn, Scott

AU - Anderson, Michelle

AU - Morgan, Wendy

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - As a new medium for questionnaire delivery, the Internet has the potential to revolutionize the survey process. Online-questionnaires can provide many capabilities not found in traditional paper-based questionnaires. Despite this, and the introduction of a plethora of tools to support online-questionnaire creation, current electronic survey design typically replicates the look-and-feel of paper-based questionnaires, thus failing to harness the full power of the electronic delivery medium. A recent environmental scan of online-questionnaire design tools found that little, if any, support is incorporated within these tools to guide questionnaire designers according to best-practice [Lumsden & Morgan 2005]. This paper briefly introduces a comprehensive set of guidelines for the design of online-questionnaires. Drawn from relevant disparate sources, all the guidelines incorporated within the set are proven in their own right; as an initial assessment of the value of the set of guidelines as a practical reference guide, we undertook an informal study to observe the effect of introducing the guidelines into the design process for a complex online-questionnaire. The paper discusses the qualitative findings — which are encouraging for the role of the guidelines in the ‘bigger picture’ of online survey delivery across many domains such as e-government, e-business, and e-health — of this case study.

AB - As a new medium for questionnaire delivery, the Internet has the potential to revolutionize the survey process. Online-questionnaires can provide many capabilities not found in traditional paper-based questionnaires. Despite this, and the introduction of a plethora of tools to support online-questionnaire creation, current electronic survey design typically replicates the look-and-feel of paper-based questionnaires, thus failing to harness the full power of the electronic delivery medium. A recent environmental scan of online-questionnaire design tools found that little, if any, support is incorporated within these tools to guide questionnaire designers according to best-practice [Lumsden & Morgan 2005]. This paper briefly introduces a comprehensive set of guidelines for the design of online-questionnaires. Drawn from relevant disparate sources, all the guidelines incorporated within the set are proven in their own right; as an initial assessment of the value of the set of guidelines as a practical reference guide, we undertook an informal study to observe the effect of introducing the guidelines into the design process for a complex online-questionnaire. The paper discusses the qualitative findings — which are encouraging for the role of the guidelines in the ‘bigger picture’ of online survey delivery across many domains such as e-government, e-business, and e-health — of this case study.

KW - online-questionnaire

KW - design guidelines

KW - evaluative case study

UR - http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F1-84628-249-7_5

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864051739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/1-84628-249-7_5

DO - 10.1007/1-84628-249-7_5

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-84628-192-1

SP - 69

EP - 83

BT - People and computers XIX — the bigger picture

A2 - McEwan, Tom

A2 - Gulliksen, Jan

A2 - Benyon, David

PB - Springer

CY - London (UK)

ER -

Lumsden J, Flinn S, Anderson M, Morgan W. What difference doguidelines make? An observational study of online-questionnaire design guidelines put to practical use. In McEwan T, Gulliksen J, Benyon D, editors, People and computers XIX — the bigger picture: proceedings of HCI 2005. London (UK): Springer. 2006. p. 69-83 https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_5