Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What’s in a name? The case for protecting the reputation of businesses under Article 1 Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights

  • Reading University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article approaches corporate reputation from an English law perspective. It argues that corporate reputation is at least as important as individual reputation, as it is not only vital for the health and prosperity of businesses themselves (whether large or small), but also for the communities within which they operate. Following analysis of conflicting jurisprudence from the European Court of Human Rights, which has led to a lack of clarity within English law, this paper contends that business reputation should be subsumed within the concept of property. Such an approach would then enable businesses to avail themselves of a positive right to the protection of reputation, as property, under Article 1 Protocol 1 of the European Convention of Human Rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-315
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of European Tort Law
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jan 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Tort, Business Reputation/Corporate Reputation as Property

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What’s in a name? The case for protecting the reputation of businesses under Article 1 Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this