When existence is not futile: The influence of mortality salience on the longer-is-better effect

Simon McCabe, Melissa R. Spina, Jamie Arndt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This research examines how death reminders impact the valuation of objects of various ages. Building from the existence bias, the longer-is-better effect posits that which exists is good and that which has existed for longer is better. Integrating terror management theory, it was reasoned that mortality reminders fostering a motivation to at least symbolically transcend death would lead participants to evaluate older object more positively as they signal robustness of existence. Participants were reminded of death (vs. control) and evaluated new, 20-, or 100-year-old objects. Results indicated death reminders resulted in greater valuation of older objects. Findings are discussed with implications for terror management theory, the longer-is-better effect, ageism, materialism, and consumer behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)600-611
Number of pages12
JournalBr. J. Soc. Psychol.
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When existence is not futile: The influence of mortality salience on the longer-is-better effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this