Whose brain to pick? The interplay of boundary spanning and transactive memory in inter-group knowledge integration

Julija N. Mell, Daan Van Knippenberg, Wendy P. Van Ginkel, Pursey Heughens

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

Knowledge exchange and integration across group boundaries are critical for knowledge intensive organizations. Prior research has investigated boundary-spanning ties on the individual as well as on the group level, neglecting, however, the question of how individual boundary spanning shapes and contributes to inter-group knowledge integration. In our study, we address this gap by integrating boundary-spanning literature with literature on group information processing and suggest that, contrary to the perspective taken by earlier research, not all individual boundary spanning ties equally contribute to inter-group knowledge integration. Rather, we hypothesize that the effect of individual boundary spanning ties on inter-group knowledge integration depends on the individuals’ positions in their groups’ transactive memory systems. We tested our predictions in a network study of 457 engineering consultants nested in 22 interdependent business units within an organization. Our results indicate that individual boundary spanning ties contribute to inter-group knowledge integration only when the knowledge seeker chooses a person who is central in his or her own group’s transactive memory system as a source of information. Seeking knowledge from persons who are peripheral in their own groups’ transactive memory systems, on the other hand, did not increase inter-group knowledge integration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)642-647
Number of pages6
JournalAcademy of Management Proceedings
Volume2014
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Event74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2014 - Philadelphia, United States
Duration: 1 Aug 20144 Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Brain
Data storage equipment
Computer peripheral equipment
Computer systems
Transactive memory
Knowledge integration
Intergroup
Boundary spanning
Industry
Transactive memory systems

Cite this

@article{8b14d1ca4fa94b7588a143bf2d3efe84,
title = "Whose brain to pick? The interplay of boundary spanning and transactive memory in inter-group knowledge integration",
abstract = "Knowledge exchange and integration across group boundaries are critical for knowledge intensive organizations. Prior research has investigated boundary-spanning ties on the individual as well as on the group level, neglecting, however, the question of how individual boundary spanning shapes and contributes to inter-group knowledge integration. In our study, we address this gap by integrating boundary-spanning literature with literature on group information processing and suggest that, contrary to the perspective taken by earlier research, not all individual boundary spanning ties equally contribute to inter-group knowledge integration. Rather, we hypothesize that the effect of individual boundary spanning ties on inter-group knowledge integration depends on the individuals’ positions in their groups’ transactive memory systems. We tested our predictions in a network study of 457 engineering consultants nested in 22 interdependent business units within an organization. Our results indicate that individual boundary spanning ties contribute to inter-group knowledge integration only when the knowledge seeker chooses a person who is central in his or her own group’s transactive memory system as a source of information. Seeking knowledge from persons who are peripheral in their own groups’ transactive memory systems, on the other hand, did not increase inter-group knowledge integration.",
author = "Mell, {Julija N.} and Knippenberg, {Daan Van} and {Van Ginkel}, {Wendy P.} and Pursey Heughens",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2014.205",
language = "English",
volume = "2014",
pages = "642--647",
journal = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
issn = "0065-0668",
number = "1",

}

Whose brain to pick? The interplay of boundary spanning and transactive memory in inter-group knowledge integration. / Mell, Julija N.; Knippenberg, Daan Van; Van Ginkel, Wendy P.; Heughens, Pursey.

In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2014, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 642-647.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whose brain to pick? The interplay of boundary spanning and transactive memory in inter-group knowledge integration

AU - Mell, Julija N.

AU - Knippenberg, Daan Van

AU - Van Ginkel, Wendy P.

AU - Heughens, Pursey

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Knowledge exchange and integration across group boundaries are critical for knowledge intensive organizations. Prior research has investigated boundary-spanning ties on the individual as well as on the group level, neglecting, however, the question of how individual boundary spanning shapes and contributes to inter-group knowledge integration. In our study, we address this gap by integrating boundary-spanning literature with literature on group information processing and suggest that, contrary to the perspective taken by earlier research, not all individual boundary spanning ties equally contribute to inter-group knowledge integration. Rather, we hypothesize that the effect of individual boundary spanning ties on inter-group knowledge integration depends on the individuals’ positions in their groups’ transactive memory systems. We tested our predictions in a network study of 457 engineering consultants nested in 22 interdependent business units within an organization. Our results indicate that individual boundary spanning ties contribute to inter-group knowledge integration only when the knowledge seeker chooses a person who is central in his or her own group’s transactive memory system as a source of information. Seeking knowledge from persons who are peripheral in their own groups’ transactive memory systems, on the other hand, did not increase inter-group knowledge integration.

AB - Knowledge exchange and integration across group boundaries are critical for knowledge intensive organizations. Prior research has investigated boundary-spanning ties on the individual as well as on the group level, neglecting, however, the question of how individual boundary spanning shapes and contributes to inter-group knowledge integration. In our study, we address this gap by integrating boundary-spanning literature with literature on group information processing and suggest that, contrary to the perspective taken by earlier research, not all individual boundary spanning ties equally contribute to inter-group knowledge integration. Rather, we hypothesize that the effect of individual boundary spanning ties on inter-group knowledge integration depends on the individuals’ positions in their groups’ transactive memory systems. We tested our predictions in a network study of 457 engineering consultants nested in 22 interdependent business units within an organization. Our results indicate that individual boundary spanning ties contribute to inter-group knowledge integration only when the knowledge seeker chooses a person who is central in his or her own group’s transactive memory system as a source of information. Seeking knowledge from persons who are peripheral in their own groups’ transactive memory systems, on the other hand, did not increase inter-group knowledge integration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026286029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/ambpp.2014.205

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.205

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.205

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85026286029

VL - 2014

SP - 642

EP - 647

JO - Academy of Management Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Proceedings

SN - 0065-0668

IS - 1

ER -