Widening access to Higher Education: an evaluative case study of a foundation year alternative to access

Peter A. Reddy, Elisabeth Moores

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Universities are encouraged to widen access to a broad range of applicants, including mature students taking Access qualifications. Admissions tutors can find it difficult to compare and choose between Access and A-level applications, and Access applicants for popular courses may be disadvantaged relative to students with good A-levels. In this evaluative case study a foundation year designed to avoid Access selection problems and widen participation in psychology, biology, optometry and pharmacy is reviewed. Progression and success rates are compared to national averages for Access courses and issues in Foundation Year management considered. The Foundation Year is rejected as unsatisfactory and it is concluded that widening participation for mature students can be achieved through Access courses. Difficulties in achieving this for high-demand courses in leading universities are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages51-64
Number of pages14
JournalPsychology Teaching Review
Volume14
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

applicant
education
participation
student
tutor
qualification
biology
psychology
university
demand
management

Bibliographical note

Reproduced with permission from Psychology Teaching Review © The British Psychological Society 2008

Keywords

  • universities
  • widen access
  • mature students
  • access qualifications
  • admission
  • a-level
  • psychology
  • biology
  • optometry
  • pharmacy
  • foundation year

Cite this

@article{e2c4dfa7f8c74f38839a6063ff800344,
title = "Widening access to Higher Education: an evaluative case study of a foundation year alternative to access",
abstract = "Universities are encouraged to widen access to a broad range of applicants, including mature students taking Access qualifications. Admissions tutors can find it difficult to compare and choose between Access and A-level applications, and Access applicants for popular courses may be disadvantaged relative to students with good A-levels. In this evaluative case study a foundation year designed to avoid Access selection problems and widen participation in psychology, biology, optometry and pharmacy is reviewed. Progression and success rates are compared to national averages for Access courses and issues in Foundation Year management considered. The Foundation Year is rejected as unsatisfactory and it is concluded that widening participation for mature students can be achieved through Access courses. Difficulties in achieving this for high-demand courses in leading universities are discussed.",
keywords = "universities, widen access, mature students, access qualifications, admission, a-level, psychology, biology, optometry, pharmacy, foundation year",
author = "Reddy, {Peter A.} and Elisabeth Moores",
note = "Reproduced with permission from Psychology Teaching Review {\circledC} The British Psychological Society 2008",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "51--64",
journal = "Psychology Teaching Review",
issn = "0965-948X",
number = "1",

}

Widening access to Higher Education : an evaluative case study of a foundation year alternative to access. / Reddy, Peter A.; Moores, Elisabeth.

In: Psychology Teaching Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2008, p. 51-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Widening access to Higher Education

T2 - Psychology Teaching Review

AU - Reddy, Peter A.

AU - Moores, Elisabeth

N1 - Reproduced with permission from Psychology Teaching Review © The British Psychological Society 2008

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Universities are encouraged to widen access to a broad range of applicants, including mature students taking Access qualifications. Admissions tutors can find it difficult to compare and choose between Access and A-level applications, and Access applicants for popular courses may be disadvantaged relative to students with good A-levels. In this evaluative case study a foundation year designed to avoid Access selection problems and widen participation in psychology, biology, optometry and pharmacy is reviewed. Progression and success rates are compared to national averages for Access courses and issues in Foundation Year management considered. The Foundation Year is rejected as unsatisfactory and it is concluded that widening participation for mature students can be achieved through Access courses. Difficulties in achieving this for high-demand courses in leading universities are discussed.

AB - Universities are encouraged to widen access to a broad range of applicants, including mature students taking Access qualifications. Admissions tutors can find it difficult to compare and choose between Access and A-level applications, and Access applicants for popular courses may be disadvantaged relative to students with good A-levels. In this evaluative case study a foundation year designed to avoid Access selection problems and widen participation in psychology, biology, optometry and pharmacy is reviewed. Progression and success rates are compared to national averages for Access courses and issues in Foundation Year management considered. The Foundation Year is rejected as unsatisfactory and it is concluded that widening participation for mature students can be achieved through Access courses. Difficulties in achieving this for high-demand courses in leading universities are discussed.

KW - universities

KW - widen access

KW - mature students

KW - access qualifications

KW - admission

KW - a-level

KW - psychology

KW - biology

KW - optometry

KW - pharmacy

KW - foundation year

UR - http://www.bpsshop.org.uk/Psychology-Teaching-Review-Vol-14-No-1-2008-P640.aspx

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 51

EP - 64

JO - Psychology Teaching Review

JF - Psychology Teaching Review

SN - 0965-948X

IS - 1

ER -