Wolfing down the Twilight series: Metaphors for reading in online reviews

Chloe Harrison, Louise Nuttall

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

The development of social media platforms devoted to the discussion of books provides a source of insights into how readers interact with texts in their daily lives and, as such, offers a growing source of data for stylistics. Popular fiction such as Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight series (2005-2008) attracts thousands (in some cases millions) of ratings and reviews by readers, which are often highly polarised. Recent work in stylistics has used such data as a source of insights into felt, experiential aspects of reading, applying the same stylistic frameworks to the reviews as those applied to the texts themselves (e.g. Harrison, 2017; Nuttall, 2017). In this chapter, we analyse the range of metaphors used by readers to describe contrasting experiences of Twilight (Book One), and the embodied experiences which contribute to both its popularity and rejection among readers. Drawing on Cognitive Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999), previous research has identified three main conceptual metaphors as reflecting readers’ engagement with texts: READING IS TRANSPORTATION, READING IS CONTROL and READING IS INVESTMENT (Stockwell, 2009). Here, we test and develop these observations by examining a sample of 200 reader reviews collected from the online forum, Goodreads. Comprising 100 of the most positive (5-star) and most negative (1-star) reviews of Twilight, these responses to the text are submitted to qualitative analysis using NVivo software, and metaphors for reading are grouped and analysed using concepts from cognitive linguistics. Applying Cognitive Grammar (Langacker, 2008), we explore the creativity with which readers extend, combine and elaborate conventional metaphors for reading in this discourse context, and identify further recurring metaphors such as READING IS EATING for this text. Comparison of our positive and negative reviews reveals differences in the mappings of these metaphors, specifically the framing of the reader, which reflects the varying quality of the embodied experiences being described. We argue that, when contextualised in relation to a particular work of fiction and a particular online discourse context, the language produced by readers can offer insights into polarised reading experiences such as immersion and resistance.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationContemporary Media Stylistics
EditorsHelen Ringrow, Stephen Pihlaja
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherBloomsbury
Chapter3
ISBN (Electronic)9781350064102
ISBN (Print)9781350064089
Publication statusPublished - 20 Feb 2020

Fingerprint

metaphor
experience
popular fiction
discourse
social media
popularity
creativity
grammar
rating
linguistics
language

Bibliographical note

© 2019 The Authors. This is the author's accepted manuscript of a chapter published in Contemporary Media Stylistics, https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/contemporary-media-stylistics-9781350064089/

Cite this

Harrison, C., & Nuttall, L. (2020). Wolfing down the Twilight series: Metaphors for reading in online reviews. In H. Ringrow, & S. Pihlaja (Eds.), Contemporary Media Stylistics London: Bloomsbury.
Harrison, Chloe ; Nuttall, Louise. / Wolfing down the Twilight series: Metaphors for reading in online reviews. Contemporary Media Stylistics. editor / Helen Ringrow ; Stephen Pihlaja . London : Bloomsbury, 2020.
@inbook{86f6f4a377d74edf98076b41f95bccf8,
title = "Wolfing down the Twilight series: Metaphors for reading in online reviews",
abstract = "The development of social media platforms devoted to the discussion of books provides a source of insights into how readers interact with texts in their daily lives and, as such, offers a growing source of data for stylistics. Popular fiction such as Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight series (2005-2008) attracts thousands (in some cases millions) of ratings and reviews by readers, which are often highly polarised. Recent work in stylistics has used such data as a source of insights into felt, experiential aspects of reading, applying the same stylistic frameworks to the reviews as those applied to the texts themselves (e.g. Harrison, 2017; Nuttall, 2017). In this chapter, we analyse the range of metaphors used by readers to describe contrasting experiences of Twilight (Book One), and the embodied experiences which contribute to both its popularity and rejection among readers. Drawing on Cognitive Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999), previous research has identified three main conceptual metaphors as reflecting readers’ engagement with texts: READING IS TRANSPORTATION, READING IS CONTROL and READING IS INVESTMENT (Stockwell, 2009). Here, we test and develop these observations by examining a sample of 200 reader reviews collected from the online forum, Goodreads. Comprising 100 of the most positive (5-star) and most negative (1-star) reviews of Twilight, these responses to the text are submitted to qualitative analysis using NVivo software, and metaphors for reading are grouped and analysed using concepts from cognitive linguistics. Applying Cognitive Grammar (Langacker, 2008), we explore the creativity with which readers extend, combine and elaborate conventional metaphors for reading in this discourse context, and identify further recurring metaphors such as READING IS EATING for this text. Comparison of our positive and negative reviews reveals differences in the mappings of these metaphors, specifically the framing of the reader, which reflects the varying quality of the embodied experiences being described. We argue that, when contextualised in relation to a particular work of fiction and a particular online discourse context, the language produced by readers can offer insights into polarised reading experiences such as immersion and resistance.",
author = "Chloe Harrison and Louise Nuttall",
note = "{\circledC} 2019 The Authors. This is the author's accepted manuscript of a chapter published in Contemporary Media Stylistics, https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/contemporary-media-stylistics-9781350064089/",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "20",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781350064089",
editor = "Ringrow, {Helen } and {Pihlaja }, Stephen",
booktitle = "Contemporary Media Stylistics",
publisher = "Bloomsbury",

}

Harrison, C & Nuttall, L 2020, Wolfing down the Twilight series: Metaphors for reading in online reviews. in H Ringrow & S Pihlaja (eds), Contemporary Media Stylistics. Bloomsbury, London.

Wolfing down the Twilight series: Metaphors for reading in online reviews. / Harrison, Chloe; Nuttall, Louise.

Contemporary Media Stylistics. ed. / Helen Ringrow; Stephen Pihlaja . London : Bloomsbury, 2020.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Wolfing down the Twilight series: Metaphors for reading in online reviews

AU - Harrison, Chloe

AU - Nuttall, Louise

N1 - © 2019 The Authors. This is the author's accepted manuscript of a chapter published in Contemporary Media Stylistics, https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/contemporary-media-stylistics-9781350064089/

PY - 2020/2/20

Y1 - 2020/2/20

N2 - The development of social media platforms devoted to the discussion of books provides a source of insights into how readers interact with texts in their daily lives and, as such, offers a growing source of data for stylistics. Popular fiction such as Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight series (2005-2008) attracts thousands (in some cases millions) of ratings and reviews by readers, which are often highly polarised. Recent work in stylistics has used such data as a source of insights into felt, experiential aspects of reading, applying the same stylistic frameworks to the reviews as those applied to the texts themselves (e.g. Harrison, 2017; Nuttall, 2017). In this chapter, we analyse the range of metaphors used by readers to describe contrasting experiences of Twilight (Book One), and the embodied experiences which contribute to both its popularity and rejection among readers. Drawing on Cognitive Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999), previous research has identified three main conceptual metaphors as reflecting readers’ engagement with texts: READING IS TRANSPORTATION, READING IS CONTROL and READING IS INVESTMENT (Stockwell, 2009). Here, we test and develop these observations by examining a sample of 200 reader reviews collected from the online forum, Goodreads. Comprising 100 of the most positive (5-star) and most negative (1-star) reviews of Twilight, these responses to the text are submitted to qualitative analysis using NVivo software, and metaphors for reading are grouped and analysed using concepts from cognitive linguistics. Applying Cognitive Grammar (Langacker, 2008), we explore the creativity with which readers extend, combine and elaborate conventional metaphors for reading in this discourse context, and identify further recurring metaphors such as READING IS EATING for this text. Comparison of our positive and negative reviews reveals differences in the mappings of these metaphors, specifically the framing of the reader, which reflects the varying quality of the embodied experiences being described. We argue that, when contextualised in relation to a particular work of fiction and a particular online discourse context, the language produced by readers can offer insights into polarised reading experiences such as immersion and resistance.

AB - The development of social media platforms devoted to the discussion of books provides a source of insights into how readers interact with texts in their daily lives and, as such, offers a growing source of data for stylistics. Popular fiction such as Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight series (2005-2008) attracts thousands (in some cases millions) of ratings and reviews by readers, which are often highly polarised. Recent work in stylistics has used such data as a source of insights into felt, experiential aspects of reading, applying the same stylistic frameworks to the reviews as those applied to the texts themselves (e.g. Harrison, 2017; Nuttall, 2017). In this chapter, we analyse the range of metaphors used by readers to describe contrasting experiences of Twilight (Book One), and the embodied experiences which contribute to both its popularity and rejection among readers. Drawing on Cognitive Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999), previous research has identified three main conceptual metaphors as reflecting readers’ engagement with texts: READING IS TRANSPORTATION, READING IS CONTROL and READING IS INVESTMENT (Stockwell, 2009). Here, we test and develop these observations by examining a sample of 200 reader reviews collected from the online forum, Goodreads. Comprising 100 of the most positive (5-star) and most negative (1-star) reviews of Twilight, these responses to the text are submitted to qualitative analysis using NVivo software, and metaphors for reading are grouped and analysed using concepts from cognitive linguistics. Applying Cognitive Grammar (Langacker, 2008), we explore the creativity with which readers extend, combine and elaborate conventional metaphors for reading in this discourse context, and identify further recurring metaphors such as READING IS EATING for this text. Comparison of our positive and negative reviews reveals differences in the mappings of these metaphors, specifically the framing of the reader, which reflects the varying quality of the embodied experiences being described. We argue that, when contextualised in relation to a particular work of fiction and a particular online discourse context, the language produced by readers can offer insights into polarised reading experiences such as immersion and resistance.

UR - https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/contemporary-media-stylistics-9781350064089/

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9781350064089

BT - Contemporary Media Stylistics

A2 - Ringrow, Helen

A2 - Pihlaja , Stephen

PB - Bloomsbury

CY - London

ER -

Harrison C, Nuttall L. Wolfing down the Twilight series: Metaphors for reading in online reviews. In Ringrow H, Pihlaja S, editors, Contemporary Media Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury. 2020