"You have ruined this entire experiment…shall we stop talking now?" Orientations to the experimental setting as an interactional resource

Nicci MacLeod, Tim Grant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

One limitation widely noted in sociolinguistics is the tension presented by the ‘observer’s paradox’ (Labov, 1972), i.e. the notion that everyday language is ‘susceptible to contamination by observation’ (Stubbs, 1983: 224). The observer’s paradox has been perceived to present significant challenges to traditional sociolinguistic researchers seeking to explore the processes at work during ordinary interaction. More recently, scholars have begun to argue that in fact the presence of a recording device, rather than being a mere constraint on spoken interaction, is in itself an interactional resource explicitly oriented to by participants (Speer & Hutchby 2003; Gordon 2012). Drawing on a collection of transcripts collected in experimental conditions as part of a wider project exploring the relationship between language and identity, this paper seeks to explore how these orientations manifest themselves in the context of Instant Messaging (IM) conversations. We show different orientations to the experimental setting, and different understandings of the role of the researcher – represented in this case by the IM chat archive – as both a topic of discussion and as a participant themselves.
LanguageEnglish
Pages63-70
Number of pages8
JournalDiscourse, Context & Media
Volume14
Early online date25 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

sociolinguistics
Contamination
colloquial
experiment
chat
interaction
environmental pollution
resources
recording
conversation
Experiments
language

Bibliographical note

© 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Funding: ESRC (ES/L003279/1).

Data DOI: http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/852099/

Keywords

  • observer’s paradox
  • instant messaging
  • footing
  • assuming identities online
  • audience

Cite this

@article{ee46f3cd705a497b8431290afb8b9033,
title = "{"}You have ruined this entire experiment…shall we stop talking now?{"} Orientations to the experimental setting as an interactional resource",
abstract = "One limitation widely noted in sociolinguistics is the tension presented by the ‘observer’s paradox’ (Labov, 1972), i.e. the notion that everyday language is ‘susceptible to contamination by observation’ (Stubbs, 1983: 224). The observer’s paradox has been perceived to present significant challenges to traditional sociolinguistic researchers seeking to explore the processes at work during ordinary interaction. More recently, scholars have begun to argue that in fact the presence of a recording device, rather than being a mere constraint on spoken interaction, is in itself an interactional resource explicitly oriented to by participants (Speer & Hutchby 2003; Gordon 2012). Drawing on a collection of transcripts collected in experimental conditions as part of a wider project exploring the relationship between language and identity, this paper seeks to explore how these orientations manifest themselves in the context of Instant Messaging (IM) conversations. We show different orientations to the experimental setting, and different understandings of the role of the researcher – represented in this case by the IM chat archive – as both a topic of discussion and as a participant themselves.",
keywords = "observer’s paradox, instant messaging, footing, assuming identities online, audience",
author = "Nicci MacLeod and Tim Grant",
note = "{\circledC} 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Funding: ESRC (ES/L003279/1). Data DOI: http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/852099/",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dcm.2016.10.001",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "63--70",
journal = "Discourse, Context & Media",
issn = "2211-6958",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "You have ruined this entire experiment…shall we stop talking now?" Orientations to the experimental setting as an interactional resource

AU - MacLeod, Nicci

AU - Grant, Tim

N1 - © 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Funding: ESRC (ES/L003279/1). Data DOI: http://reshare.ukdataservice.ac.uk/852099/

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - One limitation widely noted in sociolinguistics is the tension presented by the ‘observer’s paradox’ (Labov, 1972), i.e. the notion that everyday language is ‘susceptible to contamination by observation’ (Stubbs, 1983: 224). The observer’s paradox has been perceived to present significant challenges to traditional sociolinguistic researchers seeking to explore the processes at work during ordinary interaction. More recently, scholars have begun to argue that in fact the presence of a recording device, rather than being a mere constraint on spoken interaction, is in itself an interactional resource explicitly oriented to by participants (Speer & Hutchby 2003; Gordon 2012). Drawing on a collection of transcripts collected in experimental conditions as part of a wider project exploring the relationship between language and identity, this paper seeks to explore how these orientations manifest themselves in the context of Instant Messaging (IM) conversations. We show different orientations to the experimental setting, and different understandings of the role of the researcher – represented in this case by the IM chat archive – as both a topic of discussion and as a participant themselves.

AB - One limitation widely noted in sociolinguistics is the tension presented by the ‘observer’s paradox’ (Labov, 1972), i.e. the notion that everyday language is ‘susceptible to contamination by observation’ (Stubbs, 1983: 224). The observer’s paradox has been perceived to present significant challenges to traditional sociolinguistic researchers seeking to explore the processes at work during ordinary interaction. More recently, scholars have begun to argue that in fact the presence of a recording device, rather than being a mere constraint on spoken interaction, is in itself an interactional resource explicitly oriented to by participants (Speer & Hutchby 2003; Gordon 2012). Drawing on a collection of transcripts collected in experimental conditions as part of a wider project exploring the relationship between language and identity, this paper seeks to explore how these orientations manifest themselves in the context of Instant Messaging (IM) conversations. We show different orientations to the experimental setting, and different understandings of the role of the researcher – represented in this case by the IM chat archive – as both a topic of discussion and as a participant themselves.

KW - observer’s paradox

KW - instant messaging

KW - footing

KW - assuming identities online

KW - audience

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-852099

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994267574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.10.001

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 63

EP - 70

JO - Discourse, Context & Media

T2 - Discourse, Context & Media

JF - Discourse, Context & Media

SN - 2211-6958

ER -