How does problem based learning fit with cognitive load theory?

Michael Peters

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Published conference outputConference publication

    Abstract

    This paper reports on an investigation with first year undergraduate Product Design and Management students within a School of Engineering. The students at the time of this investigation had studied fundamental engineering science and mathematics for one semester. The students were given an open ended, ill formed problem which involved designing a simple bridge to cross a river. They were given a talk on problem solving and given a rubric to follow, if they chose to do so. They were not given any formulae or procedures needed in order to resolve the problem. In theory, they possessed the knowledge to ask the right questions in order to make assumptions but, in practice, it turned out they were unable to link their a priori knowledge to resolve this problem. They were able to solve simple beam problems when given closed questions. The results show they were unable to visualise a simple bridge as an augmented beam problem and ask pertinent questions and hence formulate appropriate assumptions in order to offer resolutions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe 17th SEFI Mathematics working Group Seminar
    Subtitle of host publicationproceedings
    EditorsBurkhard Alpers, et al
    Place of PublicationBrussels (BE)
    PublisherSociété Eropéenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs
    Number of pages7
    ISBN (Print)978-2-87352-011-3
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    Event17th SEFI-MWG European Seminar on Mathematics in Engineering Education - Dublin, Ireland
    Duration: 23 Jun 201425 Jun 2014

    Seminar

    Seminar17th SEFI-MWG European Seminar on Mathematics in Engineering Education
    Country/TerritoryIreland
    CityDublin
    Period23/06/1425/06/14

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How does problem based learning fit with cognitive load theory?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this