Misrepresentations and flawed logic about the prevalence of false memories

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

View graph of relations Save citation

Open

Authors

Research units

Abstract

Brewin and Andrews (2016) propose that just 15% of people, or even fewer, are susceptible to false childhood memories. If this figure were true, then false memories would still be a serious problem. But the figure is higher than 15%. False memories occur even after a few short and low-pressure interviews, and with each successive interview they become richer, more compelling, and more likely to occur. It is therefore dangerously misleading to claim that the scientific data provide an “upper bound” on susceptibility to memory errors. We also raise concerns about the peer review process.

Documents

  • Misrepresentations and flawed logic about the prevalence of false memories

    Rights statement: © 2016 The Authors Applied Cognitive Psychology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Final published version, 60 KB, PDF-document

    Licence: CC BY Show licence

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31–33
Number of pages3
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date14 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Bibliographic note

© 2016 The Authors Applied Cognitive Psychology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DOI

Download statistics

No data available

Employable Graduates; Exploitable Research

Copy the text from this field...