The European Council and the Legitimacy Paradox of New Intergovernmentalism: Constitutional Agency Meets Politicisation

Andrew Glencross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the actions of the European Council during the Eurozone crisis through the lens of political constitutionalism. This analysis examines the role of political inputs in shaping EU constitutional developments, whether supranational or intergovernmental, to demonstrate the “legitimacy paradox” of new intergovernmentalism. That is, the European Council claimed the electoral legitimacy to rescue the Euro, but in doing so opened up new avenues for contesting EU legitimacy, notably in relation to national budgetary decision-making. For unlike with supranational constitutional agency, the European Council has the means to politicize its actions. However, the strategy taken during the sovereign debt crisis is shown to be one of depoliticization to prevent domestic contestation of EMU reform. At the same time, paradoxically, the politics of macro-economic policy has become Europeanized with the active participation of EU supranational actors. Since EMU reform is dependent on supranational enforcement of EMU rules, the new intergovernmentalism faces political contestation that previous, supranational EU constitutional development did not.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-509
JournalJournal of European Integration
Volume38
Issue number5
Early online date19 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Bibliographical note

© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The European Council and the Legitimacy Paradox of New Intergovernmentalism: Constitutional Agency Meets Politicisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this