The role of working memory in compulsive checking and OCD: a systematic classification of 58 experimental findings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

View graph of relations Save citation

Open

Authors

Research units

Abstract

Despite the large body of research regarding the role of memory in OCD, the results are described as mixed at best (Hermans et al., 2008). For example, inconsistent findings have been reported with respect to basic capacity, intact verbal, and generally affected visuospatial memory. We suggest that this is due to the traditional pursuit of OCD memory impairment as one of the general capacity and/or domain specificity (visuospatial vs. verbal). In contrast, we conclude from our experiments (i.e., Harkin & Kessler, 2009, 2011; Harkin, Rutherford, & Kessler, 2011) and recent literature (e.g., Greisberg & McKay, 2003) that OCD memory impairment is secondary to executive dysfunction, and more specifically we identify three common factors (EBL: Executive-functioning efficiency, Binding complexity, and memory Load) that we generalize to 58 experimental findings from 46 OCD memory studies. As a result we explain otherwise inconsistent research – e.g., intact vs. deficient verbal memory – that are difficult to reconcile within a capacity or domain specific perspective. We conclude by discussing the relationship between our account and others', which in most cases is complementary rather than contradictory.

Documents

  • Role of working memory in compulsive checking and OCD

    Rights statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Clinical psychology review. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Harkin, B & Kessler, K, 'The role of working memory in compulsive checking and OCD: a systematic classification of 58 experimental findings' Clinical psychology review, vol. 31, no. 6 (2011) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.004

    Accepted author manuscript, 800 KB, PDF-document

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1004-1021
Number of pages18
JournalClinical Psychology Review
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Bibliographic note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Clinical psychology review. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Harkin, B & Kessler, K, 'The role of working memory in compulsive checking and OCD: a systematic classification of 58 experimental findings' Clinical psychology review, vol. 31, no. 6 (2011) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.004

    Keywords

  • obsessive–compulsive disorder, executive function, episodic buffer, binding complexity, memory load

Download statistics

No data available

Employable Graduates; Exploitable Research

Copy the text from this field...