To challenge, or not to challenge? Best practice when interviewing vulnerable suspects

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

View graph of relations Save citation

Authors

Research units

Abstract

This paper examines to what extent police investigators can reliably question a vulnerable suspect’s account when the evidence base for appropriate questioning styles for this particular vulnerable group is limited. We examine a simulated interview to demonstrate how difficult it is to challenge discrepancies in a vulnerable suspect’s account. It is argued from both linguistic and psychological perspectives that certain question formats may lead to acquiescence, cognitive overload and confusion for the suspect. It is suggested that one way of trying to manage these issues is through the provision of alternative narratives (i.e. ‘only one of those stories can be true’) but these too are found to be problematic.

Request a copy

Request a copy

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-313
Number of pages13
JournalPolicing
Volume6
Issue3
Early online date27 Jun 2012
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

DOI

Employable Graduates; Exploitable Research

Copy the text from this field...