Abstract
An important parameter in integrated optical device is the propagation loss of the waveguide. Its characterization gives the information of the fabrication quality as well as the information of other passive devices on the chip as it is the basic building block of the passive devices. Although, over the last three decades many methods have been developed, there is not a single standard present yet. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the methods existing from the past as well as methods developed very recently in order to provide a complete picture of the pros and cons of different types of methods and from this comparison the best method is suggested according to the authors opinion. To support the claim, apart from the analytical comparison, this paper also presents a comparison performed with the experimental results between the suggested best method which is recently proposed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) researchers based on undercoupled all-pass microring structure and the popular cut-back method.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technology (EICT 2015) |
Publisher | IEEE |
Pages | 347-352 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-4673-9257-0 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-4673-9256-3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 Jan 2016 |
Event | 2nd International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technologies - Khulna, Bangladesh Duration: 10 Dec 2015 → 12 Dec 2015 |
Conference
Conference | 2nd International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technologies |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | EICT 2015 |
Country/Territory | Bangladesh |
City | Khulna |
Period | 10/12/15 → 12/12/15 |
Bibliographical note
-Keywords
- integrated optics
- microring reseonator
- Si photonics
- waveguide propagation loss