Academic performance remains predictive over a five year medical degree

David Hope*, Helen Cameron

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Considerable efforts have been made to predict success in medical degrees. Much of the work has focused on failing students, so little is known about performance stability in medical students who pass and become doctors. If we can predict performance, we can better plan interventions and set standards. We tested the predictive capability of first year assessment on final year assessment marks in 314 graduating medical students. A linear regression model showed around half the variance in final year performance is explained by first year performance despite the very different nature of early assessment. Marks at graduation can be predicted with some accuracy using only first year results. With this information, we can better anticipate student performance and set defensible passing standards. Either first and final year assessment measures the same underlying attributes (cognitive ability, conscientiousness), first year assessment provides an absolutely critical foundation for graduation, or both.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-520
Number of pages10
JournalInnovations in Education and Teaching International
Volume55
Issue number5
Early online date24 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

performance
medical student
cognitive ability
student
regression

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • intervention
  • psychometrics
  • student performance

Cite this

@article{5eab66d27b8048ea8d5342a524303b21,
title = "Academic performance remains predictive over a five year medical degree",
abstract = "Considerable efforts have been made to predict success in medical degrees. Much of the work has focused on failing students, so little is known about performance stability in medical students who pass and become doctors. If we can predict performance, we can better plan interventions and set standards. We tested the predictive capability of first year assessment on final year assessment marks in 314 graduating medical students. A linear regression model showed around half the variance in final year performance is explained by first year performance despite the very different nature of early assessment. Marks at graduation can be predicted with some accuracy using only first year results. With this information, we can better anticipate student performance and set defensible passing standards. Either first and final year assessment measures the same underlying attributes (cognitive ability, conscientiousness), first year assessment provides an absolutely critical foundation for graduation, or both.",
keywords = "Assessment, intervention, psychometrics, student performance",
author = "David Hope and Helen Cameron",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/14703297.2018.1459199",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "511--520",
journal = "Innovations in Education and Teaching International",
issn = "1470-3297",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Academic performance remains predictive over a five year medical degree. / Hope, David; Cameron, Helen.

In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 55, No. 5, 03.09.2018, p. 511-520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Academic performance remains predictive over a five year medical degree

AU - Hope, David

AU - Cameron, Helen

PY - 2018/9/3

Y1 - 2018/9/3

N2 - Considerable efforts have been made to predict success in medical degrees. Much of the work has focused on failing students, so little is known about performance stability in medical students who pass and become doctors. If we can predict performance, we can better plan interventions and set standards. We tested the predictive capability of first year assessment on final year assessment marks in 314 graduating medical students. A linear regression model showed around half the variance in final year performance is explained by first year performance despite the very different nature of early assessment. Marks at graduation can be predicted with some accuracy using only first year results. With this information, we can better anticipate student performance and set defensible passing standards. Either first and final year assessment measures the same underlying attributes (cognitive ability, conscientiousness), first year assessment provides an absolutely critical foundation for graduation, or both.

AB - Considerable efforts have been made to predict success in medical degrees. Much of the work has focused on failing students, so little is known about performance stability in medical students who pass and become doctors. If we can predict performance, we can better plan interventions and set standards. We tested the predictive capability of first year assessment on final year assessment marks in 314 graduating medical students. A linear regression model showed around half the variance in final year performance is explained by first year performance despite the very different nature of early assessment. Marks at graduation can be predicted with some accuracy using only first year results. With this information, we can better anticipate student performance and set defensible passing standards. Either first and final year assessment measures the same underlying attributes (cognitive ability, conscientiousness), first year assessment provides an absolutely critical foundation for graduation, or both.

KW - Assessment

KW - intervention

KW - psychometrics

KW - student performance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053261460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14703297.2018.1459199

U2 - 10.1080/14703297.2018.1459199

DO - 10.1080/14703297.2018.1459199

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053261460

VL - 55

SP - 511

EP - 520

JO - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

JF - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

SN - 1470-3297

IS - 5

ER -