Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model

Samuel Aryee*, Zhen X. Chen, Li-Yun Sun, Yaw A. Debrah

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors examined antecedents of abusive supervision and the relative importance of interactional and procedural justice as mediators of the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes of affective organizational commitment and individual- and organization-directed citizenship behaviors. Data were obtained from subordinate-supervisor dyads from a telecommunication company located in southeastern China. Results of moderated regression analysis revealed that authoritarian leadership style moderated the relationship between supervisors' perceptions of interactional justice and abusive supervision such that the relationship was stronger for supervisors high rather than low in authoritarian leadership style. In addition, results of structural equation modeling analysis revealed that subordinates' perceptions of interactional but not procedural justice fully mediated the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes. Implications for future investigations of abusive supervision are discussed. Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-201
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume92
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Telecommunications
China
Regression Analysis
Organizations

Keywords

  • abusive supervision
  • authoritarian leadership style
  • organizational justice
  • trickle-down model

Cite this

Aryee, Samuel ; Chen, Zhen X. ; Sun, Li-Yun ; Debrah, Yaw A. / Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision : test of a trickle-down model. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007 ; Vol. 92, No. 1. pp. 191-201.
@article{6383e640d61d4e8ca7816c70c2e7ec62,
title = "Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model",
abstract = "The authors examined antecedents of abusive supervision and the relative importance of interactional and procedural justice as mediators of the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes of affective organizational commitment and individual- and organization-directed citizenship behaviors. Data were obtained from subordinate-supervisor dyads from a telecommunication company located in southeastern China. Results of moderated regression analysis revealed that authoritarian leadership style moderated the relationship between supervisors' perceptions of interactional justice and abusive supervision such that the relationship was stronger for supervisors high rather than low in authoritarian leadership style. In addition, results of structural equation modeling analysis revealed that subordinates' perceptions of interactional but not procedural justice fully mediated the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes. Implications for future investigations of abusive supervision are discussed. Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association.",
keywords = "abusive supervision, authoritarian leadership style, organizational justice, trickle-down model",
author = "Samuel Aryee and Chen, {Zhen X.} and Li-Yun Sun and Debrah, {Yaw A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "191--201",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision : test of a trickle-down model. / Aryee, Samuel; Chen, Zhen X.; Sun, Li-Yun; Debrah, Yaw A.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 191-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision

T2 - test of a trickle-down model

AU - Aryee, Samuel

AU - Chen, Zhen X.

AU - Sun, Li-Yun

AU - Debrah, Yaw A.

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - The authors examined antecedents of abusive supervision and the relative importance of interactional and procedural justice as mediators of the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes of affective organizational commitment and individual- and organization-directed citizenship behaviors. Data were obtained from subordinate-supervisor dyads from a telecommunication company located in southeastern China. Results of moderated regression analysis revealed that authoritarian leadership style moderated the relationship between supervisors' perceptions of interactional justice and abusive supervision such that the relationship was stronger for supervisors high rather than low in authoritarian leadership style. In addition, results of structural equation modeling analysis revealed that subordinates' perceptions of interactional but not procedural justice fully mediated the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes. Implications for future investigations of abusive supervision are discussed. Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association.

AB - The authors examined antecedents of abusive supervision and the relative importance of interactional and procedural justice as mediators of the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes of affective organizational commitment and individual- and organization-directed citizenship behaviors. Data were obtained from subordinate-supervisor dyads from a telecommunication company located in southeastern China. Results of moderated regression analysis revealed that authoritarian leadership style moderated the relationship between supervisors' perceptions of interactional justice and abusive supervision such that the relationship was stronger for supervisors high rather than low in authoritarian leadership style. In addition, results of structural equation modeling analysis revealed that subordinates' perceptions of interactional but not procedural justice fully mediated the relationship between abusive supervision and the work outcomes. Implications for future investigations of abusive supervision are discussed. Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association.

KW - abusive supervision

KW - authoritarian leadership style

KW - organizational justice

KW - trickle-down model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846273800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://psycnet.apa.org/?&fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191

M3 - Article

C2 - 17227160

VL - 92

SP - 191

EP - 201

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 1

ER -