Anterior eye health recording

James S. Wolffsohn, Shehzad A. Naroo, Caroline Christie, Judith Morris, Robert Conway,

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aims: To survey eye care practitioners from around the world regarding their current practice for anterior eye health recording to inform guidelines on best practice. Methods: The on-line survey examined the reported use of: word descriptions, sketching, grading scales or photographs; paper or computerised record cards and whether these were guided by proforma headings; grading scale choice, signs graded, level of precision, regional grading; and how much time eye care practitioners spent on average on anterior eye health recording. Results: Eight hundred and nine eye care practitioners from across the world completed the survey. Word description (p <. 0.001), sketches (p = 0.002) and grading scales (p <. 0.001) were used more for recording the anterior eye health of contact lens patients than other patients, but photography was used similarly (p = 0.132). Of the respondents, 84.5% used a grading scale, 13.5% using two, with the original Efron (51.6%) and CCLRU/Brien-Holden-Vision-Institute (48.5%) being the most popular. The median features graded was 11 (range 1-23), frequency from 91.6% (bulbar hyperaemia) to 19.6% (endothelial blebs), with most practitioners grading to the nearest unit (47.4%) and just 14.7% to one decimal place. The average time taken to report anterior eye health was reported to be 6.8. ±. 5.7. min, with the maximum time available 14.0. ±. 11. min. Conclusions: Developed practice and research evidence allows best practice guidelines for anterior eye health recording to be recommended. It is recommended to: record which grading scale is used; always grade to one decimal place, record what you see live rather than based on how you intend to manage a condition; grade bulbar and limbal hyperaemia, limbal neovascularisation, conjunctival papillary redness and roughness (in white light to assess colouration with fluorescein instilled to aid visualisation of papillae/follicles), blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction and sketch staining (both corneal and conjunctival) at every visit. Record other anterior eye features only if they are remarkable, but indicate that the key tissue which have been examined.

Original languageEnglish
JournalContact Lens and Anterior Eye
VolumeIn Press
Early online date23 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Health
Practice Guidelines
Hyperemia
Blepharitis
Meibomian Glands
Photography
Contact Lenses
Blister
Fluorescein
Guidelines
Staining and Labeling
Light
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Contact lens and anterior eye. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Wolffsohn, J. S., Naroo, S. A., Christie, C., Morris, J., Conway, R., & The British Universities Committee of Contact Lens Educators (BUCCLE) . Anterior eye health recording. Contact lens and anterior eye, vol. In Press (2015) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.001

Keywords

  • anterior eye health
  • best practice
  • contact lenses
  • grading
  • photography
  • record keeping
  • sketching

Cite this

Wolffsohn, James S. ; Naroo, Shehzad A. ; Christie, Caroline ; Morris, Judith ; Conway, Robert. / Anterior eye health recording. In: Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2015 ; Vol. In Press.
@article{3c3adea916c14f5a91fb697daa7e7722,
title = "Anterior eye health recording",
abstract = "Aims: To survey eye care practitioners from around the world regarding their current practice for anterior eye health recording to inform guidelines on best practice. Methods: The on-line survey examined the reported use of: word descriptions, sketching, grading scales or photographs; paper or computerised record cards and whether these were guided by proforma headings; grading scale choice, signs graded, level of precision, regional grading; and how much time eye care practitioners spent on average on anterior eye health recording. Results: Eight hundred and nine eye care practitioners from across the world completed the survey. Word description (p <. 0.001), sketches (p = 0.002) and grading scales (p <. 0.001) were used more for recording the anterior eye health of contact lens patients than other patients, but photography was used similarly (p = 0.132). Of the respondents, 84.5{\%} used a grading scale, 13.5{\%} using two, with the original Efron (51.6{\%}) and CCLRU/Brien-Holden-Vision-Institute (48.5{\%}) being the most popular. The median features graded was 11 (range 1-23), frequency from 91.6{\%} (bulbar hyperaemia) to 19.6{\%} (endothelial blebs), with most practitioners grading to the nearest unit (47.4{\%}) and just 14.7{\%} to one decimal place. The average time taken to report anterior eye health was reported to be 6.8. ±. 5.7. min, with the maximum time available 14.0. ±. 11. min. Conclusions: Developed practice and research evidence allows best practice guidelines for anterior eye health recording to be recommended. It is recommended to: record which grading scale is used; always grade to one decimal place, record what you see live rather than based on how you intend to manage a condition; grade bulbar and limbal hyperaemia, limbal neovascularisation, conjunctival papillary redness and roughness (in white light to assess colouration with fluorescein instilled to aid visualisation of papillae/follicles), blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction and sketch staining (both corneal and conjunctival) at every visit. Record other anterior eye features only if they are remarkable, but indicate that the key tissue which have been examined.",
keywords = "anterior eye health, best practice, contact lenses, grading, photography, record keeping, sketching",
author = "Wolffsohn, {James S.} and Naroo, {Shehzad A.} and Caroline Christie and Judith Morris and Robert Conway",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Contact lens and anterior eye. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Wolffsohn, J. S., Naroo, S. A., Christie, C., Morris, J., Conway, R., & The British Universities Committee of Contact Lens Educators (BUCCLE) . Anterior eye health recording. Contact lens and anterior eye, vol. In Press (2015) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.001",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "In Press",
journal = "Contact Lens and Anterior Eye",
issn = "1367-0484",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Anterior eye health recording. / Wolffsohn, James S.; Naroo, Shehzad A.; Christie, Caroline; Morris, Judith; Conway, Robert.

In: Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, Vol. In Press, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anterior eye health recording

AU - Wolffsohn, James S.

AU - Naroo, Shehzad A.

AU - Christie, Caroline

AU - Morris, Judith

AU - Conway, Robert

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Contact lens and anterior eye. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Wolffsohn, J. S., Naroo, S. A., Christie, C., Morris, J., Conway, R., & The British Universities Committee of Contact Lens Educators (BUCCLE) . Anterior eye health recording. Contact lens and anterior eye, vol. In Press (2015) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.001

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Aims: To survey eye care practitioners from around the world regarding their current practice for anterior eye health recording to inform guidelines on best practice. Methods: The on-line survey examined the reported use of: word descriptions, sketching, grading scales or photographs; paper or computerised record cards and whether these were guided by proforma headings; grading scale choice, signs graded, level of precision, regional grading; and how much time eye care practitioners spent on average on anterior eye health recording. Results: Eight hundred and nine eye care practitioners from across the world completed the survey. Word description (p <. 0.001), sketches (p = 0.002) and grading scales (p <. 0.001) were used more for recording the anterior eye health of contact lens patients than other patients, but photography was used similarly (p = 0.132). Of the respondents, 84.5% used a grading scale, 13.5% using two, with the original Efron (51.6%) and CCLRU/Brien-Holden-Vision-Institute (48.5%) being the most popular. The median features graded was 11 (range 1-23), frequency from 91.6% (bulbar hyperaemia) to 19.6% (endothelial blebs), with most practitioners grading to the nearest unit (47.4%) and just 14.7% to one decimal place. The average time taken to report anterior eye health was reported to be 6.8. ±. 5.7. min, with the maximum time available 14.0. ±. 11. min. Conclusions: Developed practice and research evidence allows best practice guidelines for anterior eye health recording to be recommended. It is recommended to: record which grading scale is used; always grade to one decimal place, record what you see live rather than based on how you intend to manage a condition; grade bulbar and limbal hyperaemia, limbal neovascularisation, conjunctival papillary redness and roughness (in white light to assess colouration with fluorescein instilled to aid visualisation of papillae/follicles), blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction and sketch staining (both corneal and conjunctival) at every visit. Record other anterior eye features only if they are remarkable, but indicate that the key tissue which have been examined.

AB - Aims: To survey eye care practitioners from around the world regarding their current practice for anterior eye health recording to inform guidelines on best practice. Methods: The on-line survey examined the reported use of: word descriptions, sketching, grading scales or photographs; paper or computerised record cards and whether these were guided by proforma headings; grading scale choice, signs graded, level of precision, regional grading; and how much time eye care practitioners spent on average on anterior eye health recording. Results: Eight hundred and nine eye care practitioners from across the world completed the survey. Word description (p <. 0.001), sketches (p = 0.002) and grading scales (p <. 0.001) were used more for recording the anterior eye health of contact lens patients than other patients, but photography was used similarly (p = 0.132). Of the respondents, 84.5% used a grading scale, 13.5% using two, with the original Efron (51.6%) and CCLRU/Brien-Holden-Vision-Institute (48.5%) being the most popular. The median features graded was 11 (range 1-23), frequency from 91.6% (bulbar hyperaemia) to 19.6% (endothelial blebs), with most practitioners grading to the nearest unit (47.4%) and just 14.7% to one decimal place. The average time taken to report anterior eye health was reported to be 6.8. ±. 5.7. min, with the maximum time available 14.0. ±. 11. min. Conclusions: Developed practice and research evidence allows best practice guidelines for anterior eye health recording to be recommended. It is recommended to: record which grading scale is used; always grade to one decimal place, record what you see live rather than based on how you intend to manage a condition; grade bulbar and limbal hyperaemia, limbal neovascularisation, conjunctival papillary redness and roughness (in white light to assess colouration with fluorescein instilled to aid visualisation of papillae/follicles), blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction and sketch staining (both corneal and conjunctival) at every visit. Record other anterior eye features only if they are remarkable, but indicate that the key tissue which have been examined.

KW - anterior eye health

KW - best practice

KW - contact lenses

KW - grading

KW - photography

KW - record keeping

KW - sketching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925308521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.clae.2015.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - In Press

JO - Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

JF - Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

SN - 1367-0484

ER -