Author response: can vascular function be assessed by the interpretation of retinal vascular diameter changes?

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

A protocol with repeated stimulation cycles should be analyzed stepwise, in that each stimulation is evaluated, and a reaction pattern is identified. No two subjects will react identically, in that dilation and recovery times can vary; however, this is not reason enough to abandon a multiple stimulation cycle with fixed recovery and stimulation times. Furthermore, it enables us to examine and determine the range in which a normal subject will be placed and can then be compared to different pathophysiological states (i.e., smokers and different diseases). The purpose of our paper was to highlight the importance of evaluating these different cycles and the danger of false interpretation when averaging results. There are many different ways of evaluating dilatory responses and elasticity, but each of them must be carefully evaluated and should not be overaveraged, which can result in a loss of sensitivity and specificity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)636-638
Number of pages3
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Retinal Vessels
Blood Vessels
Elasticity
Dilatation
Sensitivity and Specificity

Bibliographical note

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives

Cite this

@article{8350d0f185614c00ae7f375d98561ad2,
title = "Author response: can vascular function be assessed by the interpretation of retinal vascular diameter changes?",
abstract = "A protocol with repeated stimulation cycles should be analyzed stepwise, in that each stimulation is evaluated, and a reaction pattern is identified. No two subjects will react identically, in that dilation and recovery times can vary; however, this is not reason enough to abandon a multiple stimulation cycle with fixed recovery and stimulation times. Furthermore, it enables us to examine and determine the range in which a normal subject will be placed and can then be compared to different pathophysiological states (i.e., smokers and different diseases). The purpose of our paper was to highlight the importance of evaluating these different cycles and the danger of false interpretation when averaging results. There are many different ways of evaluating dilatory responses and elasticity, but each of them must be carefully evaluated and should not be overaveraged, which can result in a loss of sensitivity and specificity.",
author = "Rebekka Heitmar and Andrew Blann and Cubbidge, {Robert Peter} and Gregory Lip and Doina Gherghel",
note = "Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1167/iovs.10-6690",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "636--638",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "1552-5783",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author response: can vascular function be assessed by the interpretation of retinal vascular diameter changes?

AU - Heitmar, Rebekka

AU - Blann, Andrew

AU - Cubbidge, Robert Peter

AU - Lip, Gregory

AU - Gherghel, Doina

N1 - Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - A protocol with repeated stimulation cycles should be analyzed stepwise, in that each stimulation is evaluated, and a reaction pattern is identified. No two subjects will react identically, in that dilation and recovery times can vary; however, this is not reason enough to abandon a multiple stimulation cycle with fixed recovery and stimulation times. Furthermore, it enables us to examine and determine the range in which a normal subject will be placed and can then be compared to different pathophysiological states (i.e., smokers and different diseases). The purpose of our paper was to highlight the importance of evaluating these different cycles and the danger of false interpretation when averaging results. There are many different ways of evaluating dilatory responses and elasticity, but each of them must be carefully evaluated and should not be overaveraged, which can result in a loss of sensitivity and specificity.

AB - A protocol with repeated stimulation cycles should be analyzed stepwise, in that each stimulation is evaluated, and a reaction pattern is identified. No two subjects will react identically, in that dilation and recovery times can vary; however, this is not reason enough to abandon a multiple stimulation cycle with fixed recovery and stimulation times. Furthermore, it enables us to examine and determine the range in which a normal subject will be placed and can then be compared to different pathophysiological states (i.e., smokers and different diseases). The purpose of our paper was to highlight the importance of evaluating these different cycles and the danger of false interpretation when averaging results. There are many different ways of evaluating dilatory responses and elasticity, but each of them must be carefully evaluated and should not be overaveraged, which can result in a loss of sensitivity and specificity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955991862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2128212

U2 - 10.1167/iovs.10-6690

DO - 10.1167/iovs.10-6690

M3 - Letter

VL - 52

SP - 636

EP - 638

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 1552-5783

IS - 1

ER -