Authors' response: clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 macular pigment screener

Hannah Bartlett; Frank Eperjesi

doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.196386

Authors' response: clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 macular pigment screener

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

As a research group with no commercial interest in any macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measurement devices or nutritional supplements, we feel that we were well-placed to carry out an independent clinical assessment of the reliability of the MPS 9000 (Tinsley Precision Instruments, Redhill, Surrey, UK). Our study was prompted by the fact that we could not find any reported coefficient of repeatability value within the literature, and none was provided by the manufacturer.1 We had planned to use this instrument in our own research studies investigating the impact of nutritional supplementation on MPOD. For this purpose, we needed …

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	431-432
Number of pages	2
Journal	British Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume	95
Issue number	3
Early online date	22 Oct 2010
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.196386
Publication status	Published - Mar 2011

Bibliographical note

This article has been accepted for publication in British journal of ophthalmology.
The definitive copyedited, typeset version Bartlett, H & Eperjesi, F 2011, 'Authors' response: clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 macular pigment screener', British journal of ophthalmology, vol 95, no. 3, pp. 431-432 is available online at http://bjo.bmj.com/content/95/3/432

Access to Document

10.1136/bjo.2010.196386

Authors' response clinical evaluation
This article has been accepted for publication in British journal of ophthalmology. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Bartlett, H & Eperjesi, F 2011, 'Authors' response: clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 macular pigment screener', British journal of ophthalmology, vol 95, no. 3, pp. 431-432 is available online at http://bjo.bmj.com/content/95/3/432
Submitted manuscript, 27.4 KB

http://bjo.bmj.com/content/95/3/432

Cite this

@article{bcd0ab4e938f49a5b3ae2af1d337890f,

title = "Authors' response: clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 macular pigment screener",

abstract = "As a research group with no commercial interest in any macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measurement devices or nutritional supplements, we feel that we were well-placed to carry out an independent clinical assessment of the reliability of the MPS 9000 (Tinsley Precision Instruments, Redhill, Surrey, UK). Our study was prompted by the fact that we could not find any reported coefficient of repeatability value within the literature, and none was provided by the manufacturer.1 We had planned to use this instrument in our own research studies investigating the impact of nutritional supplementation on MPOD. For this purpose, we needed …",

author = "Hannah Bartlett and Frank Eperjesi",

note = "This article has been accepted for publication in British journal of ophthalmology. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Bartlett, H & Eperjesi, F 2011, 'Authors' response: clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 macular pigment screener', British journal of ophthalmology, vol 95, no. 3, pp. 431-432 is available online at http://bjo.bmj.com/content/95/3/432",

year = "2011",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1136/bjo.2010.196386",

language = "English",

volume = "95",

pages = "431--432",

journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",

issn = "0007-1161",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authors' response

T2 - clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 macular pigment screener

AU - Bartlett, Hannah

AU - Eperjesi, Frank

N1 - This article has been accepted for publication in British journal of ophthalmology. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Bartlett, H & Eperjesi, F 2011, 'Authors' response: clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 macular pigment screener', British journal of ophthalmology, vol 95, no. 3, pp. 431-432 is available online at http://bjo.bmj.com/content/95/3/432

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - As a research group with no commercial interest in any macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measurement devices or nutritional supplements, we feel that we were well-placed to carry out an independent clinical assessment of the reliability of the MPS 9000 (Tinsley Precision Instruments, Redhill, Surrey, UK). Our study was prompted by the fact that we could not find any reported coefficient of repeatability value within the literature, and none was provided by the manufacturer.1 We had planned to use this instrument in our own research studies investigating the impact of nutritional supplementation on MPOD. For this purpose, we needed …

AB - As a research group with no commercial interest in any macular pigment optical density (MPOD) measurement devices or nutritional supplements, we feel that we were well-placed to carry out an independent clinical assessment of the reliability of the MPS 9000 (Tinsley Precision Instruments, Redhill, Surrey, UK). Our study was prompted by the fact that we could not find any reported coefficient of repeatability value within the literature, and none was provided by the manufacturer.1 We had planned to use this instrument in our own research studies investigating the impact of nutritional supplementation on MPOD. For this purpose, we needed …

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952043369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2010.196386

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2010.196386

M3 - Article

C2 - 22049493

SN - 0007-1161

VL - 95

SP - 431

EP - 432

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

IS - 3

ER -

Authors' response: clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 macular pigment screener

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this