Big 4 Audit Fee Premiums for National and City-Specific Industry Leadership in the United Kingdom

Additional Evidence

Khairul Ayuni Mohd Kharuddin, Ilias G. Basioudis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between Big 4 auditor industry specialisation and audit pricing in the U.K. in a period of many changes having taken place in the market for audit services. Using a large dataset between 2004 and 2011, our empirical results show a significantly higher fee premium for the Big 4 firms who are national industry leaders as compared to city-specific industry leaders, and that the fee premium for industry leadership is only earned by the city-specific industry leaders if and when they are also the national leaders. Neither the national nor city level industry leadership alone is priced anymore in the U.K. audit market. These findings hold for the pre- and the post-GFC period only and for a number of additional analyses. The evidence suggests that the Big 4 industry leadership in the U.K. has moved away from the previously documented premium for the Big 4 cityspecific industry leadership alone, and is now driven solely by the joint Big 4 industry expertise at the national and city-specific levels concurrently. The study’s results indicate that there is a progression from city-specific industry expertise to national-specific industry expertise, and they imply that there has been an improvement in the sharing and transferability of industry knowledge and expertise among the city offices of the Big 4 firms in the U.K. in the period of investigation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Auditing
Early online date17 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Audit fees
Industry
Premium
Big 4
Expertise
Fees
Audit pricing
Audit
Progression
Audit market
Empirical results
Transferability
Auditor industry specialization

Bibliographical note

Copyright: John Wiley & Sons. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article:Big 4 Audit Fee Premiums for National and City-Specific Industry Leadership in the United Kingdom, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1099-1123. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Keywords

  • Audit fees
  • Audit market
  • Auditor reputation
  • External audit
  • Independence

Cite this

@article{1a1909fce57648c7899a5a742c3e499b,
title = "Big 4 Audit Fee Premiums for National and City-Specific Industry Leadership in the United Kingdom: Additional Evidence",
abstract = "This study investigates the relationship between Big 4 auditor industry specialisation and audit pricing in the U.K. in a period of many changes having taken place in the market for audit services. Using a large dataset between 2004 and 2011, our empirical results show a significantly higher fee premium for the Big 4 firms who are national industry leaders as compared to city-specific industry leaders, and that the fee premium for industry leadership is only earned by the city-specific industry leaders if and when they are also the national leaders. Neither the national nor city level industry leadership alone is priced anymore in the U.K. audit market. These findings hold for the pre- and the post-GFC period only and for a number of additional analyses. The evidence suggests that the Big 4 industry leadership in the U.K. has moved away from the previously documented premium for the Big 4 cityspecific industry leadership alone, and is now driven solely by the joint Big 4 industry expertise at the national and city-specific levels concurrently. The study’s results indicate that there is a progression from city-specific industry expertise to national-specific industry expertise, and they imply that there has been an improvement in the sharing and transferability of industry knowledge and expertise among the city offices of the Big 4 firms in the U.K. in the period of investigation.",
keywords = "Audit fees, Audit market, Auditor reputation, External audit, Independence",
author = "{Mohd Kharuddin}, {Khairul Ayuni} and Basioudis, {Ilias G.}",
note = "Copyright: John Wiley & Sons. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article:Big 4 Audit Fee Premiums for National and City-Specific Industry Leadership in the United Kingdom, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1099-1123. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1111/ijau.12105",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Auditing",
issn = "1090-6738",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Big 4 Audit Fee Premiums for National and City-Specific Industry Leadership in the United Kingdom

T2 - Additional Evidence

AU - Mohd Kharuddin, Khairul Ayuni

AU - Basioudis, Ilias G.

N1 - Copyright: John Wiley & Sons. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article:Big 4 Audit Fee Premiums for National and City-Specific Industry Leadership in the United Kingdom, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1099-1123. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

PY - 2017/11/17

Y1 - 2017/11/17

N2 - This study investigates the relationship between Big 4 auditor industry specialisation and audit pricing in the U.K. in a period of many changes having taken place in the market for audit services. Using a large dataset between 2004 and 2011, our empirical results show a significantly higher fee premium for the Big 4 firms who are national industry leaders as compared to city-specific industry leaders, and that the fee premium for industry leadership is only earned by the city-specific industry leaders if and when they are also the national leaders. Neither the national nor city level industry leadership alone is priced anymore in the U.K. audit market. These findings hold for the pre- and the post-GFC period only and for a number of additional analyses. The evidence suggests that the Big 4 industry leadership in the U.K. has moved away from the previously documented premium for the Big 4 cityspecific industry leadership alone, and is now driven solely by the joint Big 4 industry expertise at the national and city-specific levels concurrently. The study’s results indicate that there is a progression from city-specific industry expertise to national-specific industry expertise, and they imply that there has been an improvement in the sharing and transferability of industry knowledge and expertise among the city offices of the Big 4 firms in the U.K. in the period of investigation.

AB - This study investigates the relationship between Big 4 auditor industry specialisation and audit pricing in the U.K. in a period of many changes having taken place in the market for audit services. Using a large dataset between 2004 and 2011, our empirical results show a significantly higher fee premium for the Big 4 firms who are national industry leaders as compared to city-specific industry leaders, and that the fee premium for industry leadership is only earned by the city-specific industry leaders if and when they are also the national leaders. Neither the national nor city level industry leadership alone is priced anymore in the U.K. audit market. These findings hold for the pre- and the post-GFC period only and for a number of additional analyses. The evidence suggests that the Big 4 industry leadership in the U.K. has moved away from the previously documented premium for the Big 4 cityspecific industry leadership alone, and is now driven solely by the joint Big 4 industry expertise at the national and city-specific levels concurrently. The study’s results indicate that there is a progression from city-specific industry expertise to national-specific industry expertise, and they imply that there has been an improvement in the sharing and transferability of industry knowledge and expertise among the city offices of the Big 4 firms in the U.K. in the period of investigation.

KW - Audit fees

KW - Audit market

KW - Auditor reputation

KW - External audit

KW - Independence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034213024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijau.12105

DO - 10.1111/ijau.12105

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Auditing

JF - International Journal of Auditing

SN - 1090-6738

ER -