Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload and methods of operation on their effectiveness

R. Haward, Z. Amir, C. Borill, J. Dawson, J. Scully, M. West, R. Sainsbury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

National guidance and clinical guidelines recommended multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for cancer services in order to bring specialists in relevant disciplines together, ensure clinical decisions are fully informed, and to coordinate care effectively. However, the effectiveness of cancer teams was not previously evaluated systematically. A random sample of 72 breast cancer teams in England was studied (548 members in six core disciplines), stratified by region and caseload. Information about team constitution, processes, effectiveness, clinical performance, and members' mental well-being was gathered using appropriate instruments. Two input variables, team workload (P=0.009) and the proportion of breast care nurses (P=0.003), positively predicted overall clinical performance in multivariate analysis using a two-stage regression model. There were significant correlations between individual team inputs, team composition variables, and clinical performance. Some disciplines consistently perceived their team's effectiveness differently from the mean. Teams with shared leadership of their clinical decision-making were most effective. The mental well-being of team members appeared significantly better than in previous studies of cancer clinicians, the NHS, and the general population. This study established that team composition, working methods, and workloads are related to measures of effectiveness, including the quality of clinical care. © 2003 Cancer Research UK.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-22
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume89
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jul 2003

Fingerprint

Constitution and Bylaws
Workload
Breast Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Quality of Health Care
England
Breast
Multivariate Analysis
Nurses
Guidelines
Research
Population

Bibliographical note

© 2003 Cancer Research UK Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share-Alike 3.0 licence, subject to the conditions listed at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • clinical nurse specialist
  • collaboration
  • leadership
  • multidisciplinary team
  • outcome and process assessment
  • workload
  • caseload

Cite this

Haward, R. ; Amir, Z. ; Borill, C. ; Dawson, J. ; Scully, J. ; West, M. ; Sainsbury, R. / Breast cancer teams : the impact of constitution, new cancer workload and methods of operation on their effectiveness. In: British Journal of Cancer. 2003 ; Vol. 89, No. 1. pp. 15-22.
@article{c84805268c6a4951840916fa8fb1c039,
title = "Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload and methods of operation on their effectiveness",
abstract = "National guidance and clinical guidelines recommended multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for cancer services in order to bring specialists in relevant disciplines together, ensure clinical decisions are fully informed, and to coordinate care effectively. However, the effectiveness of cancer teams was not previously evaluated systematically. A random sample of 72 breast cancer teams in England was studied (548 members in six core disciplines), stratified by region and caseload. Information about team constitution, processes, effectiveness, clinical performance, and members' mental well-being was gathered using appropriate instruments. Two input variables, team workload (P=0.009) and the proportion of breast care nurses (P=0.003), positively predicted overall clinical performance in multivariate analysis using a two-stage regression model. There were significant correlations between individual team inputs, team composition variables, and clinical performance. Some disciplines consistently perceived their team's effectiveness differently from the mean. Teams with shared leadership of their clinical decision-making were most effective. The mental well-being of team members appeared significantly better than in previous studies of cancer clinicians, the NHS, and the general population. This study established that team composition, working methods, and workloads are related to measures of effectiveness, including the quality of clinical care. {\circledC} 2003 Cancer Research UK.",
keywords = "breast cancer, clinical nurse specialist, collaboration, leadership, multidisciplinary team, outcome and process assessment, workload, caseload",
author = "R. Haward and Z. Amir and C. Borill and J. Dawson and J. Scully and M. West and R. Sainsbury",
note = "{\circledC} 2003 Cancer Research UK Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share-Alike 3.0 licence, subject to the conditions listed at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/3.0/",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6601073",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "15--22",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

Breast cancer teams : the impact of constitution, new cancer workload and methods of operation on their effectiveness. / Haward, R.; Amir, Z.; Borill, C.; Dawson, J.; Scully, J.; West, M.; Sainsbury, R.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 89, No. 1, 07.07.2003, p. 15-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Breast cancer teams

T2 - the impact of constitution, new cancer workload and methods of operation on their effectiveness

AU - Haward, R.

AU - Amir, Z.

AU - Borill, C.

AU - Dawson, J.

AU - Scully, J.

AU - West, M.

AU - Sainsbury, R.

N1 - © 2003 Cancer Research UK Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share-Alike 3.0 licence, subject to the conditions listed at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/3.0/

PY - 2003/7/7

Y1 - 2003/7/7

N2 - National guidance and clinical guidelines recommended multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for cancer services in order to bring specialists in relevant disciplines together, ensure clinical decisions are fully informed, and to coordinate care effectively. However, the effectiveness of cancer teams was not previously evaluated systematically. A random sample of 72 breast cancer teams in England was studied (548 members in six core disciplines), stratified by region and caseload. Information about team constitution, processes, effectiveness, clinical performance, and members' mental well-being was gathered using appropriate instruments. Two input variables, team workload (P=0.009) and the proportion of breast care nurses (P=0.003), positively predicted overall clinical performance in multivariate analysis using a two-stage regression model. There were significant correlations between individual team inputs, team composition variables, and clinical performance. Some disciplines consistently perceived their team's effectiveness differently from the mean. Teams with shared leadership of their clinical decision-making were most effective. The mental well-being of team members appeared significantly better than in previous studies of cancer clinicians, the NHS, and the general population. This study established that team composition, working methods, and workloads are related to measures of effectiveness, including the quality of clinical care. © 2003 Cancer Research UK.

AB - National guidance and clinical guidelines recommended multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for cancer services in order to bring specialists in relevant disciplines together, ensure clinical decisions are fully informed, and to coordinate care effectively. However, the effectiveness of cancer teams was not previously evaluated systematically. A random sample of 72 breast cancer teams in England was studied (548 members in six core disciplines), stratified by region and caseload. Information about team constitution, processes, effectiveness, clinical performance, and members' mental well-being was gathered using appropriate instruments. Two input variables, team workload (P=0.009) and the proportion of breast care nurses (P=0.003), positively predicted overall clinical performance in multivariate analysis using a two-stage regression model. There were significant correlations between individual team inputs, team composition variables, and clinical performance. Some disciplines consistently perceived their team's effectiveness differently from the mean. Teams with shared leadership of their clinical decision-making were most effective. The mental well-being of team members appeared significantly better than in previous studies of cancer clinicians, the NHS, and the general population. This study established that team composition, working methods, and workloads are related to measures of effectiveness, including the quality of clinical care. © 2003 Cancer Research UK.

KW - breast cancer

KW - clinical nurse specialist

KW - collaboration

KW - leadership

KW - multidisciplinary team

KW - outcome and process assessment

KW - workload

KW - caseload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041844980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v89/n1/full/6601073a.html

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601073

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601073

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 15

EP - 22

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 1

ER -