Cohesion or confusion? Towards a typology for organizational learning research

Helen Shipton*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The study of organizational learning is no longer in its infancy. Since Cyert and March first introduced the notion in the early 1960s, a plethora of books and journal publications have presented their own interpretations of the meaning and significance of the term. Despite such endeavours, there is little common agreement about what organizational learning represents and how future research may build cumulatively upon the many diverse ideas articulated. The intention here is by no means to address these issues, which have been comprehensively examined elsewhere. The purpose is rather to compare and contrast approaches in order to analyse similarities and dissimilarities, together with research challenges, for each approach. This is achieved by presenting a comparative framework to categorize the literature according to (a) its prescriptive/explanatory bias and (b) in line with the level of analysis, examining whether there is a focus on the organization as a whole or upon individuals and their work communities instead. The review concludes by presenting some preliminary suggestions for cross-quadrant research. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2006.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-252
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Management Reviews
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

Bibliographical note

The definitive version is available at www.interscience.wiley.com

Keywords

  • organizational learning

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cohesion or confusion? Towards a typology for organizational learning research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this