Comparative Assessment of Rule-Based Design on the Pressures and Resulting Scantlings of High Speed Powercrafts

Jean-Baptiste R. G. Souppez, Ermina Begovic, Pradeep Sensharma, Fuhua Wang, Anders Rosen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Published conference outputConference publication

Abstract

The rules and regulations inherent to the design pressures and scantlings of high-speed powercrafts are numerous, and regularly reviewed. Recently, the new ISO 12215-5:2019 made notable changes to the way high-speed crafts are analysed, including extending the acceleration experienced up to 8 g in certain circumstances. Nevertheless, despite the multiple iterations and variety of regulatory bodies, the seminal work undertaken on planing crafts throughout the 1960s and 1970s remains the foundation of any rule-based design requirement. Consequently, this paper investigates an array of recently published rules though a comparative design case study, the current state-of-the-art across a number of regulations, and the ultimate impact on scantlings. The study reveals that, despite divergence in intermediate calculations and assumptions, similar requirements are ultimately achieved. Eventually, discussion on the comparison undertaken and future trends in high-speed marine vehicles is provided, tackling the relevance of classical planing theory in light of contemporary innovations.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProgress in Marine Science and Technology
EditorsErmina Begovic
PublisherIOS
Pages263 - 275
Volume5
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-64368-125-2
ISBN (Print)978-1-64368-124-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Oct 2020
EventSymposium on High Speed Marine Vehicles 2020 - Naples, Italy
Duration: 15 Oct 202016 Oct 2020

Conference

ConferenceSymposium on High Speed Marine Vehicles 2020
CountryItaly
CityNaples
Period15/10/2016/10/20

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Assessment of Rule-Based Design on the Pressures and Resulting Scantlings of High Speed Powercrafts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this