Comparison of subjective and objective methods to determine the retinal arterio-venous ratio using fundus photography

Rebekka Heitmar, Angelos A. Kalitzeos, Sunni R. Patel, Diana Prabhu-Das, Robert P. Cubbidge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the inter and intra observer variability of subjective grading of the retinal arterio-venous ratio (AVR) using a visual grading and to compare the subjectively derived grades to an objective method using a semi-automated computer program. Methods: Following intraocular pressure and blood pressure measurements all subjects underwent dilated fundus photography. 86 monochromatic retinal images with the optic nerve head centred (52 healthy volunteers) were obtained using a Zeiss FF450+ fundus camera. Arterio-venous ratios (AVR), central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) were calculated on three separate occasions by one single observer semi-automatically using the software VesselMap (ImedosSystems, Jena, Germany). Following the automated grading, three examiners graded the AVR visually on three separate occasions in order to assess their agreement. Results: Reproducibility of the semi-automatic parameters was excellent (ICCs: 0.97 (CRAE); 0.985 (CRVE) and 0.952 (AVR)). However, visual grading of AVR showed inter grader differences as well as discrepancies between subjectively derived and objectively calculated AVR (all p < 0.000001). Conclusion: Grader education and experience leads to inter-grader differences but more importantly, subjective grading is not capable to pick up subtle differences across healthy individuals and does not represent true AVR when compared with an objective assessment method. Technology advancements mean we no longer rely on opthalmoscopic evaluation but can capture and store fundus images with retinal cameras, enabling us to measure vessel calibre more accurately compared to visual estimation; hence it should be integrated in optometric practise for improved accuracy and reliability of clinical assessments of retinal vessel calibres.

LanguageEnglish
Pages252-257
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Optometry
Volume8
Issue number4
Early online date26 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

Fingerprint

Photography
Retinal Artery
Retinal Vein
Observer Variation
Software
Retinal Vessels
Optic Disk
Intraocular Pressure
Reproducibility of Results
Germany
Healthy Volunteers
Blood Pressure
Technology
Education

Bibliographical note

© 2014, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

  • arterio-venous ratio
  • central retinal artery equivalent
  • central retinal vein equivalent
  • reproducibility
  • retinal vessel diameter
  • semi-automated analysis
  • visual grading

Cite this

@article{39f494145de34ad4b9a18d29285d59ee,
title = "Comparison of subjective and objective methods to determine the retinal arterio-venous ratio using fundus photography",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the inter and intra observer variability of subjective grading of the retinal arterio-venous ratio (AVR) using a visual grading and to compare the subjectively derived grades to an objective method using a semi-automated computer program. Methods: Following intraocular pressure and blood pressure measurements all subjects underwent dilated fundus photography. 86 monochromatic retinal images with the optic nerve head centred (52 healthy volunteers) were obtained using a Zeiss FF450+ fundus camera. Arterio-venous ratios (AVR), central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) were calculated on three separate occasions by one single observer semi-automatically using the software VesselMap (ImedosSystems, Jena, Germany). Following the automated grading, three examiners graded the AVR visually on three separate occasions in order to assess their agreement. Results: Reproducibility of the semi-automatic parameters was excellent (ICCs: 0.97 (CRAE); 0.985 (CRVE) and 0.952 (AVR)). However, visual grading of AVR showed inter grader differences as well as discrepancies between subjectively derived and objectively calculated AVR (all p < 0.000001). Conclusion: Grader education and experience leads to inter-grader differences but more importantly, subjective grading is not capable to pick up subtle differences across healthy individuals and does not represent true AVR when compared with an objective assessment method. Technology advancements mean we no longer rely on opthalmoscopic evaluation but can capture and store fundus images with retinal cameras, enabling us to measure vessel calibre more accurately compared to visual estimation; hence it should be integrated in optometric practise for improved accuracy and reliability of clinical assessments of retinal vessel calibres.",
keywords = "arterio-venous ratio, central retinal artery equivalent, central retinal vein equivalent, reproducibility, retinal vessel diameter, semi-automated analysis, visual grading",
author = "Rebekka Heitmar and Kalitzeos, {Angelos A.} and Patel, {Sunni R.} and Diana Prabhu-Das and Cubbidge, {Robert P.}",
note = "{\circledC} 2014, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.optom.2014.07.002",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "252--257",
journal = "Journal of Optometry",
issn = "1888-4296",
publisher = "Spanish Council of Optometry",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of subjective and objective methods to determine the retinal arterio-venous ratio using fundus photography. / Heitmar, Rebekka; Kalitzeos, Angelos A.; Patel, Sunni R.; Prabhu-Das, Diana; Cubbidge, Robert P.

In: Journal of Optometry, Vol. 8, No. 4, 10.2015, p. 252-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of subjective and objective methods to determine the retinal arterio-venous ratio using fundus photography

AU - Heitmar, Rebekka

AU - Kalitzeos, Angelos A.

AU - Patel, Sunni R.

AU - Prabhu-Das, Diana

AU - Cubbidge, Robert P.

N1 - © 2014, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Purpose: To assess the inter and intra observer variability of subjective grading of the retinal arterio-venous ratio (AVR) using a visual grading and to compare the subjectively derived grades to an objective method using a semi-automated computer program. Methods: Following intraocular pressure and blood pressure measurements all subjects underwent dilated fundus photography. 86 monochromatic retinal images with the optic nerve head centred (52 healthy volunteers) were obtained using a Zeiss FF450+ fundus camera. Arterio-venous ratios (AVR), central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) were calculated on three separate occasions by one single observer semi-automatically using the software VesselMap (ImedosSystems, Jena, Germany). Following the automated grading, three examiners graded the AVR visually on three separate occasions in order to assess their agreement. Results: Reproducibility of the semi-automatic parameters was excellent (ICCs: 0.97 (CRAE); 0.985 (CRVE) and 0.952 (AVR)). However, visual grading of AVR showed inter grader differences as well as discrepancies between subjectively derived and objectively calculated AVR (all p < 0.000001). Conclusion: Grader education and experience leads to inter-grader differences but more importantly, subjective grading is not capable to pick up subtle differences across healthy individuals and does not represent true AVR when compared with an objective assessment method. Technology advancements mean we no longer rely on opthalmoscopic evaluation but can capture and store fundus images with retinal cameras, enabling us to measure vessel calibre more accurately compared to visual estimation; hence it should be integrated in optometric practise for improved accuracy and reliability of clinical assessments of retinal vessel calibres.

AB - Purpose: To assess the inter and intra observer variability of subjective grading of the retinal arterio-venous ratio (AVR) using a visual grading and to compare the subjectively derived grades to an objective method using a semi-automated computer program. Methods: Following intraocular pressure and blood pressure measurements all subjects underwent dilated fundus photography. 86 monochromatic retinal images with the optic nerve head centred (52 healthy volunteers) were obtained using a Zeiss FF450+ fundus camera. Arterio-venous ratios (AVR), central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) were calculated on three separate occasions by one single observer semi-automatically using the software VesselMap (ImedosSystems, Jena, Germany). Following the automated grading, three examiners graded the AVR visually on three separate occasions in order to assess their agreement. Results: Reproducibility of the semi-automatic parameters was excellent (ICCs: 0.97 (CRAE); 0.985 (CRVE) and 0.952 (AVR)). However, visual grading of AVR showed inter grader differences as well as discrepancies between subjectively derived and objectively calculated AVR (all p < 0.000001). Conclusion: Grader education and experience leads to inter-grader differences but more importantly, subjective grading is not capable to pick up subtle differences across healthy individuals and does not represent true AVR when compared with an objective assessment method. Technology advancements mean we no longer rely on opthalmoscopic evaluation but can capture and store fundus images with retinal cameras, enabling us to measure vessel calibre more accurately compared to visual estimation; hence it should be integrated in optometric practise for improved accuracy and reliability of clinical assessments of retinal vessel calibres.

KW - arterio-venous ratio

KW - central retinal artery equivalent

KW - central retinal vein equivalent

KW - reproducibility

KW - retinal vessel diameter

KW - semi-automated analysis

KW - visual grading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941877206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.optom.2014.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.optom.2014.07.002

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 252

EP - 257

JO - Journal of Optometry

T2 - Journal of Optometry

JF - Journal of Optometry

SN - 1888-4296

IS - 4

ER -