Continuous retinal vessel diameter m easurements: the future in retinal vessel assessment?

Rebekka Heitmar, Andrew D. Blann, Robert P. Cubbidge, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Doina Gherghel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE. To establish an alternative method, sequential and diameter response analysis (SDRA), to determine dynamic retinal vessel responses and their time course in serial stimulation compared with the established method of averaged diameter responses and standard static assessment. METHODS. SDRA focuses on individual time and diameter responses, taking into account the fluctuation in baseline diameter, providing improved insight into reaction patterns when compared with established methods as delivered by retinal vessel analyzer (RVA) software. SDRA patterns were developed with measurements from 78 healthy nonsmokers and subsequently validated in a group of 21 otherwise healthy smokers. Fundus photography and retinal vessel responses were assessed by RVA, intraocular pressure by contact tonometry, and blood pressure by sphygmomanometry. RESULTS. Compared with the RVA software method, SDRA demonstrated a marked difference in retinal vessel responses to flickering light (P 0.05). As a validation of that finding, SDRA showed a strong relation between baseline retinal vessel diameter and subsequent dilatory response in both healthy subjects and smokers (P 0.001). The RVA software was unable to detect this difference or to find a difference in retinal vessel arteriovenous ratio between smokers and nonsmokers (P 0.243). However, SDRA revealed that smokers’ vessels showed both an increased level of arterial baseline diameter fluctuation before flicker stimulation (P 0.005) and an increased stiffness of retinal arterioles (P 0.035) compared with those in nonsmokers. These differences were unrelated to intraocular pressure or systemic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS. SDRA shows promise as a tool for the assessment of vessel physiology. Further studies are needed to explore its application in patients with vascular diseases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5833-5839
Number of pages7
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Retinal Vessels
Software
Intraocular Pressure
Blood Pressure
Photography
Manometry
Arterioles
Vascular Diseases
Healthy Volunteers
Light

Bibliographical note

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License

Keywords

  • sequential and diameter response analysis
  • dynamic retinal vessel responses
  • time course
  • serial stimulation
  • averaged diameter responses
  • standard static assessment
  • SDRA
  • vessel physiology
  • vascular diseases

Cite this

@article{ffc510339f7b4bddb6c3d7501e276165,
title = "Continuous retinal vessel diameter m easurements: the future in retinal vessel assessment?",
abstract = "PURPOSE. To establish an alternative method, sequential and diameter response analysis (SDRA), to determine dynamic retinal vessel responses and their time course in serial stimulation compared with the established method of averaged diameter responses and standard static assessment. METHODS. SDRA focuses on individual time and diameter responses, taking into account the fluctuation in baseline diameter, providing improved insight into reaction patterns when compared with established methods as delivered by retinal vessel analyzer (RVA) software. SDRA patterns were developed with measurements from 78 healthy nonsmokers and subsequently validated in a group of 21 otherwise healthy smokers. Fundus photography and retinal vessel responses were assessed by RVA, intraocular pressure by contact tonometry, and blood pressure by sphygmomanometry. RESULTS. Compared with the RVA software method, SDRA demonstrated a marked difference in retinal vessel responses to flickering light (P 0.05). As a validation of that finding, SDRA showed a strong relation between baseline retinal vessel diameter and subsequent dilatory response in both healthy subjects and smokers (P 0.001). The RVA software was unable to detect this difference or to find a difference in retinal vessel arteriovenous ratio between smokers and nonsmokers (P 0.243). However, SDRA revealed that smokers’ vessels showed both an increased level of arterial baseline diameter fluctuation before flicker stimulation (P 0.005) and an increased stiffness of retinal arterioles (P 0.035) compared with those in nonsmokers. These differences were unrelated to intraocular pressure or systemic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS. SDRA shows promise as a tool for the assessment of vessel physiology. Further studies are needed to explore its application in patients with vascular diseases.",
keywords = "sequential and diameter response analysis, dynamic retinal vessel responses, time course, serial stimulation, averaged diameter responses, standard static assessment, SDRA, vessel physiology, vascular diseases",
author = "Rebekka Heitmar and Blann, {Andrew D.} and Cubbidge, {Robert P.} and Lip, {Gregory Y.H.} and Doina Gherghel",
note = "Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1167/iovs.09-5136",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "5833--5839",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "1552-5783",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "11",

}

Continuous retinal vessel diameter m easurements: the future in retinal vessel assessment? / Heitmar, Rebekka; Blann, Andrew D.; Cubbidge, Robert P.; Lip, Gregory Y.H.; Gherghel, Doina.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 51, No. 11, 30.04.2010, p. 5833-5839.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuous retinal vessel diameter m easurements: the future in retinal vessel assessment?

AU - Heitmar, Rebekka

AU - Blann, Andrew D.

AU - Cubbidge, Robert P.

AU - Lip, Gregory Y.H.

AU - Gherghel, Doina

N1 - Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License

PY - 2010/4/30

Y1 - 2010/4/30

N2 - PURPOSE. To establish an alternative method, sequential and diameter response analysis (SDRA), to determine dynamic retinal vessel responses and their time course in serial stimulation compared with the established method of averaged diameter responses and standard static assessment. METHODS. SDRA focuses on individual time and diameter responses, taking into account the fluctuation in baseline diameter, providing improved insight into reaction patterns when compared with established methods as delivered by retinal vessel analyzer (RVA) software. SDRA patterns were developed with measurements from 78 healthy nonsmokers and subsequently validated in a group of 21 otherwise healthy smokers. Fundus photography and retinal vessel responses were assessed by RVA, intraocular pressure by contact tonometry, and blood pressure by sphygmomanometry. RESULTS. Compared with the RVA software method, SDRA demonstrated a marked difference in retinal vessel responses to flickering light (P 0.05). As a validation of that finding, SDRA showed a strong relation between baseline retinal vessel diameter and subsequent dilatory response in both healthy subjects and smokers (P 0.001). The RVA software was unable to detect this difference or to find a difference in retinal vessel arteriovenous ratio between smokers and nonsmokers (P 0.243). However, SDRA revealed that smokers’ vessels showed both an increased level of arterial baseline diameter fluctuation before flicker stimulation (P 0.005) and an increased stiffness of retinal arterioles (P 0.035) compared with those in nonsmokers. These differences were unrelated to intraocular pressure or systemic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS. SDRA shows promise as a tool for the assessment of vessel physiology. Further studies are needed to explore its application in patients with vascular diseases.

AB - PURPOSE. To establish an alternative method, sequential and diameter response analysis (SDRA), to determine dynamic retinal vessel responses and their time course in serial stimulation compared with the established method of averaged diameter responses and standard static assessment. METHODS. SDRA focuses on individual time and diameter responses, taking into account the fluctuation in baseline diameter, providing improved insight into reaction patterns when compared with established methods as delivered by retinal vessel analyzer (RVA) software. SDRA patterns were developed with measurements from 78 healthy nonsmokers and subsequently validated in a group of 21 otherwise healthy smokers. Fundus photography and retinal vessel responses were assessed by RVA, intraocular pressure by contact tonometry, and blood pressure by sphygmomanometry. RESULTS. Compared with the RVA software method, SDRA demonstrated a marked difference in retinal vessel responses to flickering light (P 0.05). As a validation of that finding, SDRA showed a strong relation between baseline retinal vessel diameter and subsequent dilatory response in both healthy subjects and smokers (P 0.001). The RVA software was unable to detect this difference or to find a difference in retinal vessel arteriovenous ratio between smokers and nonsmokers (P 0.243). However, SDRA revealed that smokers’ vessels showed both an increased level of arterial baseline diameter fluctuation before flicker stimulation (P 0.005) and an increased stiffness of retinal arterioles (P 0.035) compared with those in nonsmokers. These differences were unrelated to intraocular pressure or systemic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS. SDRA shows promise as a tool for the assessment of vessel physiology. Further studies are needed to explore its application in patients with vascular diseases.

KW - sequential and diameter response analysis

KW - dynamic retinal vessel responses

KW - time course

KW - serial stimulation

KW - averaged diameter responses

KW - standard static assessment

KW - SDRA

KW - vessel physiology

KW - vascular diseases

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956057771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.iovs.org/content/51/11/5833.full

U2 - 10.1167/iovs.09-5136

DO - 10.1167/iovs.09-5136

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 5833

EP - 5839

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 1552-5783

IS - 11

ER -