Conventional and microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass under different heating rates

Chunfei Wu, Vitaliy L. Budarin, Mark J. Gronnow, Mario De Bruyn, Jude A. Onwudili, James H. Clark, Paul T. Williams*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Biomass was subjected to conventional and microwave pyrolysis, to determine the influence of each process on the yield and composition of the derived gas, oil and char products. The influence of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate for the conventional pyrolysis and the microwave power was investigated. Two major stages of gas release were observed during biomass pyrolysis, the first being CO/CO2 and the second one CH4/H2. This two-stage gas release was much more obvious for the conventional pyrolysis. While similar yield of liquid was obtained for both cases of conventional and microwave pyrolysis (∼46 wt.%), higher gas yield was produced for the conventional pyrolysis; it is suggested that microwave pyrolysis is much faster. When the heating rate was increased, the peak release of CO and CO2 was moved to higher reaction temperature for both conventional (500 °C) and microwave pyrolysis (200 °C). The production of CH4 and H 2 were very low at a conventional pyrolysis temperature of 310 °C and microwave pyrolysis temperature of 200 °C (600 and 900 W). However, at higher heating rate of microwave pyrolysis, clear release of CH4 was observed. This work tentatively demonstrates possible connections and difference for biomass pyrolysis using two different heating resources (conventional and microwave heating).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-283
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Volume107
Early online date4 Apr 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • Biomass
  • Conventional
  • Microwave
  • Pyrolysis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conventional and microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass under different heating rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this