Current knowledge on the role of the inferior frontal gyrus in Theory of Mind - a commentary on Schurz and Tholen (2016)

Charlotte Hartwright, Peter C. Hansen, Ian A. Apperly

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Schurz and Tholen (2016) argue that common approaches to studying the neural basis of “theory of mind” (ToM) obscure a potentially important role for inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in managing conflict between perspectives, and urge new work to address this question: “to gain a full understanding of the IFG's role in ToM, we encourage future imaging studies to use a wider range of control conditions.” (p332). We wholeheartedly agree, but note that this observation has been made before, and has already led to a programme of work that provides evidence from fMRI, EEG, and TMS on the role of IFG in managing conflict between self and other perspectives in ToM. We highlight these works, and in particular we demonstrate how careful manipulation within ToM tasks has been used to act as an internal control condition, wherein conflict has been manipulated within-subject. We further add to the discussion by framing key questions that remain regarding IFG in the context of these. Using limitations in the existing research, we outline how best researchers can proceed with the challenge set by Schurz and Tholen (2016).
LanguageEnglish
Pages133-136
Number of pages4
JournalCortex
Volume85
Early online date22 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Theory of Mind
Prefrontal Cortex
Ego
Electroencephalography
Research Personnel
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Research
Conflict (Psychology)

Bibliographical note

© 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Funding: ESRC (ES/G01258X/1).

Keywords

  • Theory of Mind
  • social cognition
  • self perspective inhibition
  • inhibition
  • mentalizing
  • review
  • brain

Cite this

@article{6c9787e8b52e4fe0a398d97e1dafd853,
title = "Current knowledge on the role of the inferior frontal gyrus in Theory of Mind - a commentary on Schurz and Tholen (2016)",
abstract = "Schurz and Tholen (2016) argue that common approaches to studying the neural basis of “theory of mind” (ToM) obscure a potentially important role for inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in managing conflict between perspectives, and urge new work to address this question: “to gain a full understanding of the IFG's role in ToM, we encourage future imaging studies to use a wider range of control conditions.” (p332). We wholeheartedly agree, but note that this observation has been made before, and has already led to a programme of work that provides evidence from fMRI, EEG, and TMS on the role of IFG in managing conflict between self and other perspectives in ToM. We highlight these works, and in particular we demonstrate how careful manipulation within ToM tasks has been used to act as an internal control condition, wherein conflict has been manipulated within-subject. We further add to the discussion by framing key questions that remain regarding IFG in the context of these. Using limitations in the existing research, we outline how best researchers can proceed with the challenge set by Schurz and Tholen (2016).",
keywords = "Theory of Mind, social cognition, self perspective inhibition, inhibition, mentalizing, review, brain",
author = "Charlotte Hartwright and Hansen, {Peter C.} and Apperly, {Ian A.}",
note = "{\circledC} 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Funding: ESRC (ES/G01258X/1).",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.005",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "133--136",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Current knowledge on the role of the inferior frontal gyrus in Theory of Mind - a commentary on Schurz and Tholen (2016). / Hartwright, Charlotte; Hansen, Peter C.; Apperly, Ian A.

In: Cortex, Vol. 85, 01.12.2016, p. 133-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current knowledge on the role of the inferior frontal gyrus in Theory of Mind - a commentary on Schurz and Tholen (2016)

AU - Hartwright, Charlotte

AU - Hansen, Peter C.

AU - Apperly, Ian A.

N1 - © 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Funding: ESRC (ES/G01258X/1).

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Schurz and Tholen (2016) argue that common approaches to studying the neural basis of “theory of mind” (ToM) obscure a potentially important role for inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in managing conflict between perspectives, and urge new work to address this question: “to gain a full understanding of the IFG's role in ToM, we encourage future imaging studies to use a wider range of control conditions.” (p332). We wholeheartedly agree, but note that this observation has been made before, and has already led to a programme of work that provides evidence from fMRI, EEG, and TMS on the role of IFG in managing conflict between self and other perspectives in ToM. We highlight these works, and in particular we demonstrate how careful manipulation within ToM tasks has been used to act as an internal control condition, wherein conflict has been manipulated within-subject. We further add to the discussion by framing key questions that remain regarding IFG in the context of these. Using limitations in the existing research, we outline how best researchers can proceed with the challenge set by Schurz and Tholen (2016).

AB - Schurz and Tholen (2016) argue that common approaches to studying the neural basis of “theory of mind” (ToM) obscure a potentially important role for inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in managing conflict between perspectives, and urge new work to address this question: “to gain a full understanding of the IFG's role in ToM, we encourage future imaging studies to use a wider range of control conditions.” (p332). We wholeheartedly agree, but note that this observation has been made before, and has already led to a programme of work that provides evidence from fMRI, EEG, and TMS on the role of IFG in managing conflict between self and other perspectives in ToM. We highlight these works, and in particular we demonstrate how careful manipulation within ToM tasks has been used to act as an internal control condition, wherein conflict has been manipulated within-subject. We further add to the discussion by framing key questions that remain regarding IFG in the context of these. Using limitations in the existing research, we outline how best researchers can proceed with the challenge set by Schurz and Tholen (2016).

KW - Theory of Mind

KW - social cognition

KW - self perspective inhibition

KW - inhibition

KW - mentalizing

KW - review

KW - brain

UR - http://osf.io/pxbtv

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997693754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.005

M3 - Review article

VL - 85

SP - 133

EP - 136

JO - Cortex

T2 - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

ER -