TY - JOUR
T1 - Disciplining human rights organisations through an accounting regulation
T2 - A case of the ‘foreign agents’ law in Russia
AU - Goncharenko, Galina
AU - Khadaroo, Iqbal
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Governments in certain countries have directly and indirectly influenced the activism of non-governmental organisations (NGOs). This study extends prior studies on NGO accountability by showing the potency of accounting in enabling governments to use the pretext of visibility to indirectly achieve an outcome – curbing activism – similar to that resulting from the direct prohibition of foreign funding. It examines how an accounting regulation was utilised to discipline human rights organisations (HROs) and their members of staff by using the case of the ‘foreign agents’ law in Russia. This accounting regulation abruptly changed accounting for foreign funding to stigmatise HROs and influence their political activism. More specifically, the ‘foreign agents’ law: created a new group of governable objects by labelling them as ‘NGOs performing the functions of a foreign agent’ to distinguish them from other types of NGOs; encumbered NGOs with costly reporting requirements; and empowered government authorities to discipline ‘deviant NGOs’ and their employees. The threat of inspections, penalties, damaged reputations and spoiled identities through public shaming campaigns and negative publicity not only resulted in a substantial reduction in human rights activism but also led to the demise of Russian HROs and human rights defenders.
AB - Governments in certain countries have directly and indirectly influenced the activism of non-governmental organisations (NGOs). This study extends prior studies on NGO accountability by showing the potency of accounting in enabling governments to use the pretext of visibility to indirectly achieve an outcome – curbing activism – similar to that resulting from the direct prohibition of foreign funding. It examines how an accounting regulation was utilised to discipline human rights organisations (HROs) and their members of staff by using the case of the ‘foreign agents’ law in Russia. This accounting regulation abruptly changed accounting for foreign funding to stigmatise HROs and influence their political activism. More specifically, the ‘foreign agents’ law: created a new group of governable objects by labelling them as ‘NGOs performing the functions of a foreign agent’ to distinguish them from other types of NGOs; encumbered NGOs with costly reporting requirements; and empowered government authorities to discipline ‘deviant NGOs’ and their employees. The threat of inspections, penalties, damaged reputations and spoiled identities through public shaming campaigns and negative publicity not only resulted in a substantial reduction in human rights activism but also led to the demise of Russian HROs and human rights defenders.
KW - Accounting regulation
KW - Disciplinary power
KW - Foreign funding restrictions
KW - Human rights organisations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076508240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104523541930108X?via%3Dihub
U2 - 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102129
DO - 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102129
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85076508240
SN - 1045-2354
VL - 72
JO - Critical Perspectives on Accounting
JF - Critical Perspectives on Accounting
M1 - 102129
ER -