Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance

Daan van Knippenberg, Michael A. West, Jeremy F. Dawson, Astrid C. Homan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Faultline theory suggests that negative effects of team diversity are better understood by considering the influence of different dimensions of diversity in conjunction, rather than for each dimension separately. We develop and extend the social categorization analysis that lies at the heart of faultline theory to identify a factor that attenuates the negative influence of faultlines: the extent to which the team has shared objectives. The hypothesized moderating role of shared objectives received support in a study of faultlines formed by differences in gender, tenure, and functional background in 42 top management teams. The focus on top management teams has the additional benefit of providing the first test of the relationship between diversity faultlines and objective indicators of organizational performance. We discuss how these findings, and the innovative way in which we operationalized faultlines, extend faultline theory and research as well as offer guidelines to manage diversity faultlines.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-336
Number of pages30
JournalHuman Relations
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • diversity
  • faultlines
  • functional background diversity
  • gender diversity
  • social categorization
  • social identity
  • teamstenure diversity
  • top management teams

Cite this

van Knippenberg, D., West, M. A., Dawson, J. F., & Homan, A. C. (2011). Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance. Human Relations, 64(3), 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710378384