European development NGOs and the diversion of aid: Contestation, fence-sitting, or adaptation?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract


Motivation
The article examines the advocacy strategies of European non‐government development organizations (NGDOs). The development aid literature has not put much emphasis on understanding NGDOs’ aid‐related advocacy strategies, and the literature on interest groups has so far neglected to explain why groups select different advocacy strategies within the same policy area.

Purpose
The article explains how NGDOs have selected advocacy strategies during the process of reformulating the European Consensus in 2016/17, in response to attempts by the European Union (EU) to divert aid from poverty reduction to three other goals: managing migration, funding climate change adaptation (CCA), and funding the private sector.

Approach and methods
The article develops a framework explaining NGDOs’ strategy selection, looking at the politicization of the policy change, its impact on NGDOs’ funding, and its relation to the groups’ normative positions. The article uses qualitative data from NGDO documents and interviews with senior staff of NGDO networks based in Brussels.

Findings
NGDOs used different strategies for the three cases of aid diversion: they contested aid diversion for managing migration; mainly choose fence‐sitting in case of CCA; and gradually became more adaptive towards diverting aid to fund the private sector. The three variables of politicization, impact on funding, and relation to normative positions explain the strategies selected by NGDOs in all three cases.

Policy implications
The findings can help NGDOs in selecting the most appropriate advocacy strategies for changes in aid policy, allowing them to become more effective in influencing the EU institutions and member state governments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-179
Number of pages19
JournalDevelopment Policy Review
Volume38
Issue number2
Early online date1 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

    Fingerprint

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Rozbicka, P. and Szent‐Iványi, B. (2018), European development NGOs and the diversion of aid: Contestation, fence‐sitting, or adaptation?. Dev Policy Rev. Accepted Author Manuscript, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12417.  This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

Keywords

  • Advocacy
  • New European Consensus
  • climate change
  • foreign aid
  • interest groups
  • migration
  • non-government development organizations (NGDOs)
  • private sector

Cite this