Abstract
Multiple, complementary explanations have been developed to explain audit demand. Substantial evidence exists for these explanations in the private sector, but they have been explored to a lesser extent in the public sector. We assess the extent to which these explanations for the value of auditing are relevant in the public sector by examining evidence from New Zealand. We find the use of overlapping explanations helps to explain how auditing is valuable to a wide variety of users.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 304-314 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Public Money and Management |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 25 Feb 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Public Money & Management on 25 Feb 2020, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09540962.2020.1729532Keywords
- Agency costs
- New Zealand
- Office of the Auditor-General (NZ)
- armchair auditors
- audit demand
- financial reporting
- management control
- supreme audit institutions (SAIs)