Full and partial privatization in China: the labor consequences

Kevin Amess, Jun Du, Sourafel Girma

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

This paper is the first paper to present findings evaluating the consequences for employees of full and partial privatization using difference-in-differences combined with propensity score matching. We find: (1) partial privatization causes job creation in contrast to full privatization, which destroys jobs, (2) full privatization causes higher labor productivity improvement than partial privatization, (3) wage increases occur only in partially privatized firms and (4) there are small increases in labor quality investment in both cases. The results suggest partial privatization exploits market discipline to induce labor productivity whilst simultaneously providing welfare improvements for labor. This is the ‘win-win’ outcome predicted by the ‘helping hand’ theory of government. Our results suggest that governments are likely to gain wider support for a program of partial privatization rather than full privatization.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherUniversity of Nottingham
Publication statusUnpublished - 2008

Publication series

NameNottingham University Business School Research Papers
PublisherNottingham University
No.2009-17

Fingerprint

Partial privatization
Labor
China
Privatization
Labour productivity
Government
Productivity improvement
Employees
Wages
Job creation
Propensity score matching
Market discipline
Win-win
Labor quality
Difference-in-differences

Keywords

  • multiple treatments
  • average treatment effect
  • propensity score matching
  • privatization evaluation

Cite this

Amess, K., Du, J., & Girma, S. (2008). Full and partial privatization in China: the labor consequences. (Nottingham University Business School Research Papers; No. 2009-17). University of Nottingham.
Amess, Kevin ; Du, Jun ; Girma, Sourafel. / Full and partial privatization in China : the labor consequences. University of Nottingham, 2008. (Nottingham University Business School Research Papers; 2009-17).
@techreport{16529a87c0444b6d9f12a435d6e5b445,
title = "Full and partial privatization in China: the labor consequences",
abstract = "This paper is the first paper to present findings evaluating the consequences for employees of full and partial privatization using difference-in-differences combined with propensity score matching. We find: (1) partial privatization causes job creation in contrast to full privatization, which destroys jobs, (2) full privatization causes higher labor productivity improvement than partial privatization, (3) wage increases occur only in partially privatized firms and (4) there are small increases in labor quality investment in both cases. The results suggest partial privatization exploits market discipline to induce labor productivity whilst simultaneously providing welfare improvements for labor. This is the ‘win-win’ outcome predicted by the ‘helping hand’ theory of government. Our results suggest that governments are likely to gain wider support for a program of partial privatization rather than full privatization.",
keywords = "multiple treatments, average treatment effect, propensity score matching, privatization evaluation",
author = "Kevin Amess and Jun Du and Sourafel Girma",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
series = "Nottingham University Business School Research Papers",
publisher = "University of Nottingham",
number = "2009-17",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "University of Nottingham",

}

Amess, K, Du, J & Girma, S 2008 'Full and partial privatization in China: the labor consequences' Nottingham University Business School Research Papers, no. 2009-17, University of Nottingham.

Full and partial privatization in China : the labor consequences. / Amess, Kevin; Du, Jun; Girma, Sourafel.

University of Nottingham, 2008. (Nottingham University Business School Research Papers; No. 2009-17).

Research output: Working paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Full and partial privatization in China

T2 - the labor consequences

AU - Amess, Kevin

AU - Du, Jun

AU - Girma, Sourafel

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This paper is the first paper to present findings evaluating the consequences for employees of full and partial privatization using difference-in-differences combined with propensity score matching. We find: (1) partial privatization causes job creation in contrast to full privatization, which destroys jobs, (2) full privatization causes higher labor productivity improvement than partial privatization, (3) wage increases occur only in partially privatized firms and (4) there are small increases in labor quality investment in both cases. The results suggest partial privatization exploits market discipline to induce labor productivity whilst simultaneously providing welfare improvements for labor. This is the ‘win-win’ outcome predicted by the ‘helping hand’ theory of government. Our results suggest that governments are likely to gain wider support for a program of partial privatization rather than full privatization.

AB - This paper is the first paper to present findings evaluating the consequences for employees of full and partial privatization using difference-in-differences combined with propensity score matching. We find: (1) partial privatization causes job creation in contrast to full privatization, which destroys jobs, (2) full privatization causes higher labor productivity improvement than partial privatization, (3) wage increases occur only in partially privatized firms and (4) there are small increases in labor quality investment in both cases. The results suggest partial privatization exploits market discipline to induce labor productivity whilst simultaneously providing welfare improvements for labor. This is the ‘win-win’ outcome predicted by the ‘helping hand’ theory of government. Our results suggest that governments are likely to gain wider support for a program of partial privatization rather than full privatization.

KW - multiple treatments

KW - average treatment effect

KW - propensity score matching

KW - privatization evaluation

UR - http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/gep/research/papers/2009/09-11.aspx

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Nottingham University Business School Research Papers

BT - Full and partial privatization in China

PB - University of Nottingham

ER -

Amess K, Du J, Girma S. Full and partial privatization in China: the labor consequences. University of Nottingham. 2008. (Nottingham University Business School Research Papers; 2009-17).