How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli–Robson test?

Fabrizio Zeri*, Paolo Calcatelli, Eleonora Funaro, Marialuisa Martelli, Shehzad A. Naroo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of a computer-generated Pelli–Robson test displayed on liquid crystal display (LCD) systems compared to a standard Pelli–Robson chart. Methods: Two different randomized crossover experiments were carried out for two different LCD systems for 32 subjects: 6 females and 10 males (40.5 ± 13.0 years) and 9 females and 7 males (27.8 ± 12.2 years), respectively, in the first and second experiment. Two repeated measurements were taken with the printed Pelli–Robson test and with the LCDs at 1 and 3 m. To test LCD reliability, measurements were repeated after 1 week. Results: In Experiment 1, contrast sensitivity (CS) measured with LCD1 resulted significantly higher than Pelli–Robson both at 1 and at 3 m of about 0.20 log 1/C in both eyes (p < 0.01). Bland–Altman plots showed a proportional bias for LCD1 measures. LCD1 measurements showed reasonable repeatability: ICC was 0.83 and 0.65 at 1 and 3 m, respectively. In Experiment 2, CS measured with LCD2 resulted significantly lower than Pelli–Robson both at 1 and at 3 m of about 0.10 log 1/C in both eyes (p < 0.01). Bland–Altman plots did not show any proportional bias for LCD2 measures. LCD2 measurements showed sufficient repeatability: ICC resulted 0.51 and 0.65 at 1 and 3 m, respectively. Conclusions: Computer-generated versions of Pelli–Robson test, displayed on LCD systems, do not provide accurate results compared to classic Pelli–Robson printed version. Clinicians should consider that Pelli–Robson computer-generated versions could be non-interchangeable to the printed version.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1473-1484
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Ophthalmology
Volume38
Issue number4
Early online date21 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Jun 2017

Bibliographical note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0609-0

Keywords

  • computerized-based stimuli
  • contrast sensitivity
  • LCD systems
  • Pelli–Robson test

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli–Robson test?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this