Individual information security, user behaviour and cyber victimisation: An empirical study of social networking users

G. Saridakis, V. Benson, J.-N. Ezingeard, H. Tennakoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While extant literature on privacy in social networks is plentiful, issues pertaining to information security remain largely unexplored. This paper empirically examines the relationship between online victimisation and users' activity and perceptions of personal information security on social networking services (SNS). Based on a survey of active users, we explore how behavioural patterns on social networks, personal characteristics and technical efficacy of users impact the risk of facing online victimisation. Our results suggest that users with high-risk propensity are more likely to become victims of cybercrime, whereas those with high perceptions of their ability to control information shared on SNS are less likely to become victims. The study shows that there is a negative and statistically significant association between multipurpose dominant SNS (e.g. Facebook, Google +) usage and victimisation. However, activity on the SNS for knowledge exchange (e.g. LinkedIn, Blogger) has a positive and statistically significant association with online victimisation. Our results have implications for practice as they inform the social media industry that protection of individual information security on SNS cannot be left entirely to the user. The importance of user awareness in the context of social technologies plays an important role in preventing victimisation, and social networking services should provide adequate controls to protect personal information.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)320-330
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume102
Early online date26 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Social Networking
Crime Victims
Security of data
Social Work
Social Support
Social Media
Computer Security
Privacy
Victimization
Social networking
Empirical study
User behavior
Information security
Industry
Technology

Bibliographical note

© 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Cite this

@article{16ceddb56775407c90245d34f44ee972,
title = "Individual information security, user behaviour and cyber victimisation: An empirical study of social networking users",
abstract = "While extant literature on privacy in social networks is plentiful, issues pertaining to information security remain largely unexplored. This paper empirically examines the relationship between online victimisation and users' activity and perceptions of personal information security on social networking services (SNS). Based on a survey of active users, we explore how behavioural patterns on social networks, personal characteristics and technical efficacy of users impact the risk of facing online victimisation. Our results suggest that users with high-risk propensity are more likely to become victims of cybercrime, whereas those with high perceptions of their ability to control information shared on SNS are less likely to become victims. The study shows that there is a negative and statistically significant association between multipurpose dominant SNS (e.g. Facebook, Google +) usage and victimisation. However, activity on the SNS for knowledge exchange (e.g. LinkedIn, Blogger) has a positive and statistically significant association with online victimisation. Our results have implications for practice as they inform the social media industry that protection of individual information security on SNS cannot be left entirely to the user. The importance of user awareness in the context of social technologies plays an important role in preventing victimisation, and social networking services should provide adequate controls to protect personal information.",
author = "G. Saridakis and V. Benson and J.-N. Ezingeard and H. Tennakoon",
note = "{\circledC} 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.012",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "320--330",
journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
issn = "0040-1625",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Individual information security, user behaviour and cyber victimisation: An empirical study of social networking users. / Saridakis, G.; Benson, V.; Ezingeard, J.-N.; Tennakoon, H.

In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 102, 01.01.2016, p. 320-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual information security, user behaviour and cyber victimisation: An empirical study of social networking users

AU - Saridakis, G.

AU - Benson, V.

AU - Ezingeard, J.-N.

AU - Tennakoon, H.

N1 - © 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - While extant literature on privacy in social networks is plentiful, issues pertaining to information security remain largely unexplored. This paper empirically examines the relationship between online victimisation and users' activity and perceptions of personal information security on social networking services (SNS). Based on a survey of active users, we explore how behavioural patterns on social networks, personal characteristics and technical efficacy of users impact the risk of facing online victimisation. Our results suggest that users with high-risk propensity are more likely to become victims of cybercrime, whereas those with high perceptions of their ability to control information shared on SNS are less likely to become victims. The study shows that there is a negative and statistically significant association between multipurpose dominant SNS (e.g. Facebook, Google +) usage and victimisation. However, activity on the SNS for knowledge exchange (e.g. LinkedIn, Blogger) has a positive and statistically significant association with online victimisation. Our results have implications for practice as they inform the social media industry that protection of individual information security on SNS cannot be left entirely to the user. The importance of user awareness in the context of social technologies plays an important role in preventing victimisation, and social networking services should provide adequate controls to protect personal information.

AB - While extant literature on privacy in social networks is plentiful, issues pertaining to information security remain largely unexplored. This paper empirically examines the relationship between online victimisation and users' activity and perceptions of personal information security on social networking services (SNS). Based on a survey of active users, we explore how behavioural patterns on social networks, personal characteristics and technical efficacy of users impact the risk of facing online victimisation. Our results suggest that users with high-risk propensity are more likely to become victims of cybercrime, whereas those with high perceptions of their ability to control information shared on SNS are less likely to become victims. The study shows that there is a negative and statistically significant association between multipurpose dominant SNS (e.g. Facebook, Google +) usage and victimisation. However, activity on the SNS for knowledge exchange (e.g. LinkedIn, Blogger) has a positive and statistically significant association with online victimisation. Our results have implications for practice as they inform the social media industry that protection of individual information security on SNS cannot be left entirely to the user. The importance of user awareness in the context of social technologies plays an important role in preventing victimisation, and social networking services should provide adequate controls to protect personal information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84949494803&partnerID=MN8TOARS

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162515002590?via%3Dihub

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.012

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.012

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 320

EP - 330

JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

SN - 0040-1625

ER -