Inside ‘Inside View’: reflections on stimulating debate and engagement through a multimedia live theatre production on the dilemmas and issues of pre-natal screening policy and practice

Gillian L. Hundt, Claudette Bryanston, Pam K. Lowe, Saul Cross, Jane Sandall, Kevin Spencer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background The role of applied theatre in engaging both lay and professional publics with debate on health policy and practice is an emergent field. This paper discusses the development, production performance and discussion of ‘Inside View’.1 Objectives The objectives were to produce applied theatre from research findings of a completed study on genetic prenatal screening, exploring the dilemmas for women and health professionals of prenatal genetic screening, and to engage audiences in debate and reflection on the dilemmas of prenatal genetic screening. Methods ‘Inside View’ was developed from a multidisciplinary research study through identification of emergent themes from qualitative interviews, and development of these by the writer, theatre producer and media technologist with input from the researchers. Findings Inside View was performed in London and the Midlands to varied audiences with a panel discussion and evaluation post performance. The audiences were engaged in debate that was relevant to them professionally and personally. Knowledge translation through applied theatre is an effective tool for engaging the public but the impact subsequently is unclear. There are ethical issues of unexpected disclosure during discussion post performance and the process of transforming research findings into applied theatre requires time and trust within the multidisciplinary team as well as adequate resourcing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Multimedia
Genetic Testing
Prenatal Diagnosis
Research
Translational Medical Research
Disclosure
Women's Health
Health Policy
Ethics
Research Personnel
Interviews

Keywords

  • applied theatre
  • debate and engagement
  • evaluation
  • ethics
  • prenatal screening

Cite this

@article{d38869bf5168485b910e4d4aa3e8da35,
title = "Inside ‘Inside View’: reflections on stimulating debate and engagement through a multimedia live theatre production on the dilemmas and issues of pre-natal screening policy and practice",
abstract = "Background The role of applied theatre in engaging both lay and professional publics with debate on health policy and practice is an emergent field. This paper discusses the development, production performance and discussion of ‘Inside View’.1 Objectives The objectives were to produce applied theatre from research findings of a completed study on genetic prenatal screening, exploring the dilemmas for women and health professionals of prenatal genetic screening, and to engage audiences in debate and reflection on the dilemmas of prenatal genetic screening. Methods ‘Inside View’ was developed from a multidisciplinary research study through identification of emergent themes from qualitative interviews, and development of these by the writer, theatre producer and media technologist with input from the researchers. Findings Inside View was performed in London and the Midlands to varied audiences with a panel discussion and evaluation post performance. The audiences were engaged in debate that was relevant to them professionally and personally. Knowledge translation through applied theatre is an effective tool for engaging the public but the impact subsequently is unclear. There are ethical issues of unexpected disclosure during discussion post performance and the process of transforming research findings into applied theatre requires time and trust within the multidisciplinary team as well as adequate resourcing.",
keywords = "applied theatre, debate and engagement, evaluation, ethics, prenatal screening",
author = "Hundt, {Gillian L.} and Claudette Bryanston and Lowe, {Pam K.} and Saul Cross and Jane Sandall and Kevin Spencer",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00597.x",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Inside ‘Inside View’: reflections on stimulating debate and engagement through a multimedia live theatre production on the dilemmas and issues of pre-natal screening policy and practice. / Hundt, Gillian L.; Bryanston, Claudette; Lowe, Pam K.; Cross, Saul; Sandall, Jane; Spencer, Kevin.

In: Health Expectations, Vol. 14, No. 1, 03.2011, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inside ‘Inside View’: reflections on stimulating debate and engagement through a multimedia live theatre production on the dilemmas and issues of pre-natal screening policy and practice

AU - Hundt, Gillian L.

AU - Bryanston, Claudette

AU - Lowe, Pam K.

AU - Cross, Saul

AU - Sandall, Jane

AU - Spencer, Kevin

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Background The role of applied theatre in engaging both lay and professional publics with debate on health policy and practice is an emergent field. This paper discusses the development, production performance and discussion of ‘Inside View’.1 Objectives The objectives were to produce applied theatre from research findings of a completed study on genetic prenatal screening, exploring the dilemmas for women and health professionals of prenatal genetic screening, and to engage audiences in debate and reflection on the dilemmas of prenatal genetic screening. Methods ‘Inside View’ was developed from a multidisciplinary research study through identification of emergent themes from qualitative interviews, and development of these by the writer, theatre producer and media technologist with input from the researchers. Findings Inside View was performed in London and the Midlands to varied audiences with a panel discussion and evaluation post performance. The audiences were engaged in debate that was relevant to them professionally and personally. Knowledge translation through applied theatre is an effective tool for engaging the public but the impact subsequently is unclear. There are ethical issues of unexpected disclosure during discussion post performance and the process of transforming research findings into applied theatre requires time and trust within the multidisciplinary team as well as adequate resourcing.

AB - Background The role of applied theatre in engaging both lay and professional publics with debate on health policy and practice is an emergent field. This paper discusses the development, production performance and discussion of ‘Inside View’.1 Objectives The objectives were to produce applied theatre from research findings of a completed study on genetic prenatal screening, exploring the dilemmas for women and health professionals of prenatal genetic screening, and to engage audiences in debate and reflection on the dilemmas of prenatal genetic screening. Methods ‘Inside View’ was developed from a multidisciplinary research study through identification of emergent themes from qualitative interviews, and development of these by the writer, theatre producer and media technologist with input from the researchers. Findings Inside View was performed in London and the Midlands to varied audiences with a panel discussion and evaluation post performance. The audiences were engaged in debate that was relevant to them professionally and personally. Knowledge translation through applied theatre is an effective tool for engaging the public but the impact subsequently is unclear. There are ethical issues of unexpected disclosure during discussion post performance and the process of transforming research findings into applied theatre requires time and trust within the multidisciplinary team as well as adequate resourcing.

KW - applied theatre

KW - debate and engagement

KW - evaluation

KW - ethics

KW - prenatal screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951730230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00597.x/abstract

U2 - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00597.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00597.x

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 1

ER -