Is cyberstalking different?

L.P. Sheridan, Tim D. Grant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Very little empirical work exists on cyberstalking. The current study analysed detailed questionnaires completed by 1051 self-defined stalking victims. Almost half (47.5%) reported harassment via the Internet, but only 7.2% of the sample was judged to have been cyberstalked. Ordinal regression analyses of four groups of victims, categorized according to degree of cyber involvement in their victimization, revealed a general picture of similarity between the groups in terms of the stalking process, responses to being stalked, and the effects on victims and third parties. It was concluded that cyberstalking does not fundamentally differ from traditional, proximal stalking, that online harassment does not necessarily hold broad appeal to stalkers, and that those who target ex-intimates remain the most populous stalker type.
LanguageEnglish
Pages627-640
Number of pages14
JournalPsychology, Crime and Law
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Stalking
stalking
Crime Victims
victimization
Internet
appeal
Group
Regression Analysis
regression
questionnaire

Keywords

  • stalking
  • cyberstalking
  • Internet
  • harassment

Cite this

Sheridan, L.P. ; Grant, Tim D. / Is cyberstalking different?. In: Psychology, Crime and Law. 2007 ; Vol. 13, No. 6. pp. 627-640.
@article{53170221ac364090bce03d999f699949,
title = "Is cyberstalking different?",
abstract = "Very little empirical work exists on cyberstalking. The current study analysed detailed questionnaires completed by 1051 self-defined stalking victims. Almost half (47.5{\%}) reported harassment via the Internet, but only 7.2{\%} of the sample was judged to have been cyberstalked. Ordinal regression analyses of four groups of victims, categorized according to degree of cyber involvement in their victimization, revealed a general picture of similarity between the groups in terms of the stalking process, responses to being stalked, and the effects on victims and third parties. It was concluded that cyberstalking does not fundamentally differ from traditional, proximal stalking, that online harassment does not necessarily hold broad appeal to stalkers, and that those who target ex-intimates remain the most populous stalker type.",
keywords = "stalking, cyberstalking, Internet, harassment",
author = "L.P. Sheridan and Grant, {Tim D.}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/10683160701340528",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "627--640",
journal = "Psychology, Crime and Law",
issn = "1068-316X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Is cyberstalking different? / Sheridan, L.P.; Grant, Tim D.

In: Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 13, No. 6, 12.2007, p. 627-640.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is cyberstalking different?

AU - Sheridan, L.P.

AU - Grant, Tim D.

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Very little empirical work exists on cyberstalking. The current study analysed detailed questionnaires completed by 1051 self-defined stalking victims. Almost half (47.5%) reported harassment via the Internet, but only 7.2% of the sample was judged to have been cyberstalked. Ordinal regression analyses of four groups of victims, categorized according to degree of cyber involvement in their victimization, revealed a general picture of similarity between the groups in terms of the stalking process, responses to being stalked, and the effects on victims and third parties. It was concluded that cyberstalking does not fundamentally differ from traditional, proximal stalking, that online harassment does not necessarily hold broad appeal to stalkers, and that those who target ex-intimates remain the most populous stalker type.

AB - Very little empirical work exists on cyberstalking. The current study analysed detailed questionnaires completed by 1051 self-defined stalking victims. Almost half (47.5%) reported harassment via the Internet, but only 7.2% of the sample was judged to have been cyberstalked. Ordinal regression analyses of four groups of victims, categorized according to degree of cyber involvement in their victimization, revealed a general picture of similarity between the groups in terms of the stalking process, responses to being stalked, and the effects on victims and third parties. It was concluded that cyberstalking does not fundamentally differ from traditional, proximal stalking, that online harassment does not necessarily hold broad appeal to stalkers, and that those who target ex-intimates remain the most populous stalker type.

KW - stalking

KW - cyberstalking

KW - Internet

KW - harassment

UR - http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1068-316X&volume=13&issue=6&spage=627

U2 - 10.1080/10683160701340528

DO - 10.1080/10683160701340528

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 627

EP - 640

JO - Psychology, Crime and Law

T2 - Psychology, Crime and Law

JF - Psychology, Crime and Law

SN - 1068-316X

IS - 6

ER -