It's what you do and the way that you do it: team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes

Luis A. Curral, Rosalind H. Forrester, Jeremy F. Dawson, Michael A. West

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article describes a study of the relationships between team inputs (task type and team size) and team processes in 87 cross industry Portuguese teams, some of which had high and some low requirements to innovate. Team processes were measured using the Team Climate Inventory (TCI), which focuses on clarity of and commitment to team objectives, levels of participation, support for innovation, and quality emphases. Three hypotheses were tested. The first proposed that teams carrying out tasks with a high innovation requirement would have high scores on a measure of team processes. This was supported insofar as such teams reported higher levels of participation and support for innovation. The second hypothesis proposed that large teams would have poorer team processes. This hypothesis was confirmed. The third hypothesis concerned the interaction between size and innovation. The results suggested that large teams operating under a relatively high pressure to innovate have poorer team processes than large teams that do not have a high requirement to innovate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-204
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Group Processes
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Climate
Industry
Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Group processes
Team size
Innovation

Keywords

  • team inputs
  • team processes
  • cross industry
  • Portuguese teams
  • innovation
  • Team Climate Inventory
  • TCI
  • team objectives
  • levels of participation
  • support for innovation
  • quality emphases

Cite this

Curral, Luis A. ; Forrester, Rosalind H. ; Dawson, Jeremy F. ; West, Michael A. / It's what you do and the way that you do it : team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. In: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2001 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 187-204.
@article{3b9d7ae8a3a448c5a7869b745730a2b7,
title = "It's what you do and the way that you do it: team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes",
abstract = "This article describes a study of the relationships between team inputs (task type and team size) and team processes in 87 cross industry Portuguese teams, some of which had high and some low requirements to innovate. Team processes were measured using the Team Climate Inventory (TCI), which focuses on clarity of and commitment to team objectives, levels of participation, support for innovation, and quality emphases. Three hypotheses were tested. The first proposed that teams carrying out tasks with a high innovation requirement would have high scores on a measure of team processes. This was supported insofar as such teams reported higher levels of participation and support for innovation. The second hypothesis proposed that large teams would have poorer team processes. This hypothesis was confirmed. The third hypothesis concerned the interaction between size and innovation. The results suggested that large teams operating under a relatively high pressure to innovate have poorer team processes than large teams that do not have a high requirement to innovate.",
keywords = "team inputs, team processes, cross industry, Portuguese teams, innovation, Team Climate Inventory, TCI, team objectives, levels of participation, support for innovation, quality emphases",
author = "Curral, {Luis A.} and Forrester, {Rosalind H.} and Dawson, {Jeremy F.} and West, {Michael A.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1080/13594320143000627",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "187--204",
journal = "European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology",
issn = "1359-432X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

It's what you do and the way that you do it : team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. / Curral, Luis A.; Forrester, Rosalind H.; Dawson, Jeremy F.; West, Michael A.

In: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2001, p. 187-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - It's what you do and the way that you do it

T2 - team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes

AU - Curral, Luis A.

AU - Forrester, Rosalind H.

AU - Dawson, Jeremy F.

AU - West, Michael A.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This article describes a study of the relationships between team inputs (task type and team size) and team processes in 87 cross industry Portuguese teams, some of which had high and some low requirements to innovate. Team processes were measured using the Team Climate Inventory (TCI), which focuses on clarity of and commitment to team objectives, levels of participation, support for innovation, and quality emphases. Three hypotheses were tested. The first proposed that teams carrying out tasks with a high innovation requirement would have high scores on a measure of team processes. This was supported insofar as such teams reported higher levels of participation and support for innovation. The second hypothesis proposed that large teams would have poorer team processes. This hypothesis was confirmed. The third hypothesis concerned the interaction between size and innovation. The results suggested that large teams operating under a relatively high pressure to innovate have poorer team processes than large teams that do not have a high requirement to innovate.

AB - This article describes a study of the relationships between team inputs (task type and team size) and team processes in 87 cross industry Portuguese teams, some of which had high and some low requirements to innovate. Team processes were measured using the Team Climate Inventory (TCI), which focuses on clarity of and commitment to team objectives, levels of participation, support for innovation, and quality emphases. Three hypotheses were tested. The first proposed that teams carrying out tasks with a high innovation requirement would have high scores on a measure of team processes. This was supported insofar as such teams reported higher levels of participation and support for innovation. The second hypothesis proposed that large teams would have poorer team processes. This hypothesis was confirmed. The third hypothesis concerned the interaction between size and innovation. The results suggested that large teams operating under a relatively high pressure to innovate have poorer team processes than large teams that do not have a high requirement to innovate.

KW - team inputs

KW - team processes

KW - cross industry

KW - Portuguese teams

KW - innovation

KW - Team Climate Inventory

KW - TCI

KW - team objectives

KW - levels of participation

KW - support for innovation

KW - quality emphases

UR - http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1359-432X&volume=10&issue=2&spage=187

U2 - 10.1080/13594320143000627

DO - 10.1080/13594320143000627

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 187

EP - 204

JO - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

JF - European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

SN - 1359-432X

IS - 2

ER -