Long form vs short space: what happens to periphrastic tenses in SMS?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The influence of text messaging on language has been hotly debated especially in relation to spelling and the lexicon, but the impact of SMS on syntax has received less attention.This article focuses on manipulations within the verbal domain, as language evolution points towards a consistent trend going from synthetic to analytical forms (Bybee et al. 1994), which goes against the need for concision in texting.
Based on an authentic corpus of about 500 SMS (Fairon et al. 2006b), the present study shows condensation strategies that are similar to those already described, yet reveals specific features such as the absence of aphaeresis and the scarcity of apocope, as well as the overuse of synthetic forms. It can thus be concluded that while SMS writing displays oral characteristics, it cannot obviously be assimilated to speech; in addition, it may well slow down language evolution and support the conservation of short standard forms.
Translated title of the contributionLong form vs short space: what happens to periphrastic tenses in SMS?
LanguageFrench
Pages131-144
Number of pages15
JournalStudii de lingvistică
Volume4
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

SMS
language
syntax
manipulation
conservation
trend
Tense
Evolution of Language
Language
Lexicon
Syntax
Scarcity
Manipulation
Conservation
Standard Form
Spelling
Text Messaging
Apocope
Condensation

Keywords

  • SMS language
  • language evolutiohn
  • simple future
  • periphrastic future
  • written language
  • spoken language

Cite this

@article{bca1ba90a2384506aac03035b17a88e6,
title = "Quand l’analytique se fait synth{\'e}tique:: les formes verbales p{\'e}riphrastiques dans le texto",
abstract = "The influence of text messaging on language has been hotly debated especially in relation to spelling and the lexicon, but the impact of SMS on syntax has received less attention.This article focuses on manipulations within the verbal domain, as language evolution points towards a consistent trend going from synthetic to analytical forms (Bybee et al. 1994), which goes against the need for concision in texting. Based on an authentic corpus of about 500 SMS (Fairon et al. 2006b), the present study shows condensation strategies that are similar to those already described, yet reveals specific features such as the absence of aphaeresis and the scarcity of apocope, as well as the overuse of synthetic forms. It can thus be concluded that while SMS writing displays oral characteristics, it cannot obviously be assimilated to speech; in addition, it may well slow down language evolution and support the conservation of short standard forms.",
keywords = "SMS language, language evolutiohn, simple future, periphrastic future, written language, spoken language",
author = "Emmanuelle Labeau",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "31",
language = "French",
volume = "4",
pages = "131--144",
journal = "Studii de lingvistică",
issn = "2248-2547",
publisher = "University of Oradea Publishing House",

}

Quand l’analytique se fait synthétique: les formes verbales périphrastiques dans le texto. / Labeau, Emmanuelle.

In: Studii de lingvistică, Vol. 4, 31.12.2014, p. 131-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quand l’analytique se fait synthétique:

T2 - Studii de lingvistică

AU - Labeau, Emmanuelle

PY - 2014/12/31

Y1 - 2014/12/31

N2 - The influence of text messaging on language has been hotly debated especially in relation to spelling and the lexicon, but the impact of SMS on syntax has received less attention.This article focuses on manipulations within the verbal domain, as language evolution points towards a consistent trend going from synthetic to analytical forms (Bybee et al. 1994), which goes against the need for concision in texting. Based on an authentic corpus of about 500 SMS (Fairon et al. 2006b), the present study shows condensation strategies that are similar to those already described, yet reveals specific features such as the absence of aphaeresis and the scarcity of apocope, as well as the overuse of synthetic forms. It can thus be concluded that while SMS writing displays oral characteristics, it cannot obviously be assimilated to speech; in addition, it may well slow down language evolution and support the conservation of short standard forms.

AB - The influence of text messaging on language has been hotly debated especially in relation to spelling and the lexicon, but the impact of SMS on syntax has received less attention.This article focuses on manipulations within the verbal domain, as language evolution points towards a consistent trend going from synthetic to analytical forms (Bybee et al. 1994), which goes against the need for concision in texting. Based on an authentic corpus of about 500 SMS (Fairon et al. 2006b), the present study shows condensation strategies that are similar to those already described, yet reveals specific features such as the absence of aphaeresis and the scarcity of apocope, as well as the overuse of synthetic forms. It can thus be concluded that while SMS writing displays oral characteristics, it cannot obviously be assimilated to speech; in addition, it may well slow down language evolution and support the conservation of short standard forms.

KW - SMS language

KW - language evolutiohn

KW - simple future

KW - periphrastic future

KW - written language

KW - spoken language

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 131

EP - 144

JO - Studii de lingvistică

JF - Studii de lingvistică

SN - 2248-2547

ER -