Numerical Comparison of the Drag Models of Granular Flows Applied to the Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass

K. Papadikis, S. Gu, A. Fivga, Anthony V. Bridgwater

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The paper presents a comparison between the different drag models for granular flows developed in the literature and the effect of each one of them on the fast pyrolysis of wood. The process takes place on an 100 g/h lab scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor located at Aston University. FLUENT 6.3 is used as the modeling framework of the fluidized bed hydrodynamics, while the fast pyrolysis of the discrete wood particles is incorporated as an external user defined function (UDF) hooked to FLUENT’s main code structure. Three different drag models for granular flows are compared, namely the Gidaspow, Syamlal O’Brien, and Wen-Yu, already incorporated in FLUENT’s main code, and their impact on particle trajectory, heat transfer, degradation rate, product yields, and char residence time is quantified. The Eulerian approach is used to model the bubbling behavior of the sand, which is treated as a continuum. Biomass reaction kinetics is modeled according to the literature using a two-stage, semiglobal model that takes into account secondary reactions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2133-2145
Number of pages13
JournalEnergy and Fuels
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Drag
Biomass
Pyrolysis
Fluidized beds
Wood
Reaction kinetics
Sand
Hydrodynamics
Trajectories
Heat transfer
Degradation

Keywords

  • granular flows
  • fast pyrolysis
  • biomass reaction kinetics
  • bioenergy
  • chemical engineering

Cite this

@article{532923dc70ef4680938360c2ed83474c,
title = "Numerical Comparison of the Drag Models of Granular Flows Applied to the Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass",
abstract = "The paper presents a comparison between the different drag models for granular flows developed in the literature and the effect of each one of them on the fast pyrolysis of wood. The process takes place on an 100 g/h lab scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor located at Aston University. FLUENT 6.3 is used as the modeling framework of the fluidized bed hydrodynamics, while the fast pyrolysis of the discrete wood particles is incorporated as an external user defined function (UDF) hooked to FLUENT’s main code structure. Three different drag models for granular flows are compared, namely the Gidaspow, Syamlal O’Brien, and Wen-Yu, already incorporated in FLUENT’s main code, and their impact on particle trajectory, heat transfer, degradation rate, product yields, and char residence time is quantified. The Eulerian approach is used to model the bubbling behavior of the sand, which is treated as a continuum. Biomass reaction kinetics is modeled according to the literature using a two-stage, semiglobal model that takes into account secondary reactions.",
keywords = "granular flows, fast pyrolysis, biomass reaction kinetics, bioenergy, chemical engineering",
author = "K. Papadikis and S. Gu and A. Fivga and Bridgwater, {Anthony V.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1021/ef901497b",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "2133--2145",
journal = "Energy and Fuels",
issn = "0887-0624",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "3",

}

Numerical Comparison of the Drag Models of Granular Flows Applied to the Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass. / Papadikis, K.; Gu, S.; Fivga, A.; Bridgwater, Anthony V.

In: Energy and Fuels, Vol. 24, No. 3, 22.02.2010, p. 2133-2145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical Comparison of the Drag Models of Granular Flows Applied to the Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass

AU - Papadikis, K.

AU - Gu, S.

AU - Fivga, A.

AU - Bridgwater, Anthony V.

PY - 2010/2/22

Y1 - 2010/2/22

N2 - The paper presents a comparison between the different drag models for granular flows developed in the literature and the effect of each one of them on the fast pyrolysis of wood. The process takes place on an 100 g/h lab scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor located at Aston University. FLUENT 6.3 is used as the modeling framework of the fluidized bed hydrodynamics, while the fast pyrolysis of the discrete wood particles is incorporated as an external user defined function (UDF) hooked to FLUENT’s main code structure. Three different drag models for granular flows are compared, namely the Gidaspow, Syamlal O’Brien, and Wen-Yu, already incorporated in FLUENT’s main code, and their impact on particle trajectory, heat transfer, degradation rate, product yields, and char residence time is quantified. The Eulerian approach is used to model the bubbling behavior of the sand, which is treated as a continuum. Biomass reaction kinetics is modeled according to the literature using a two-stage, semiglobal model that takes into account secondary reactions.

AB - The paper presents a comparison between the different drag models for granular flows developed in the literature and the effect of each one of them on the fast pyrolysis of wood. The process takes place on an 100 g/h lab scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor located at Aston University. FLUENT 6.3 is used as the modeling framework of the fluidized bed hydrodynamics, while the fast pyrolysis of the discrete wood particles is incorporated as an external user defined function (UDF) hooked to FLUENT’s main code structure. Three different drag models for granular flows are compared, namely the Gidaspow, Syamlal O’Brien, and Wen-Yu, already incorporated in FLUENT’s main code, and their impact on particle trajectory, heat transfer, degradation rate, product yields, and char residence time is quantified. The Eulerian approach is used to model the bubbling behavior of the sand, which is treated as a continuum. Biomass reaction kinetics is modeled according to the literature using a two-stage, semiglobal model that takes into account secondary reactions.

KW - granular flows

KW - fast pyrolysis

KW - biomass reaction kinetics

KW - bioenergy

KW - chemical engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950196919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ef901497b

U2 - 10.1021/ef901497b

DO - 10.1021/ef901497b

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 2133

EP - 2145

JO - Energy and Fuels

JF - Energy and Fuels

SN - 0887-0624

IS - 3

ER -