Outsourcing decisions

the case of parallel production

Daniel Nordigarden, Jakob Rehme, Staffan Brege, Daniel Chicksand, Helen Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate an underexplored aspect of outsourcing involving a mixed strategy in which parallel production is continued in-house at the same time as outsourcing occurs.
Design/methodology/approach – The study applied a multiple case study approach and drew on qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews with wood product manufacturing companies.
Findings – The paper posits that there should be a variety of mixed strategies between the two governance forms of “make” or “buy.” In order to address how companies should consider the extent to which they outsource, the analysis was structured around two ends of a continuum: in-house dominance or outsourcing dominance. With an in-house-dominant strategy, outsourcing complements an organization's own production to optimize capacity utilization and outsource less cost-efficient production, or is used as a tool to learn how to outsource. With an outsourcing-dominant strategy, in-house production helps maintain complementary competencies and avoids lock-in risk.
Research limitations/implications – This paper takes initial steps toward an exploration of different mixed strategies. Additional research is required to understand the costs of different mixed strategies compared with insourcing and outsourcing, and to study parallel production from a supplier viewpoint.
Practical implications – This paper suggests that managers should think twice before rushing to a “me too” outsourcing strategy in which in-house capacities are completely closed. It is important to take a dynamic view of outsourcing that maintains a mixed strategy as an option, particularly in situations that involve an underdeveloped supplier market and/or as a way to develop resources over the long term.
Originality/value – The concept of combining both “make” and “buy” is not new. However, little if any research has focussed explicitly on exploring the variety of different types of mixed strategies that exist on the continuum between insourcing and outsourcing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)974-1002
Number of pages28
JournalInternational Journal of Operations and Production Management
Volume34
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Outsourcing
Wood products
Mixed strategy
Costs
Industry
Managers

Keywords

  • outsourcing
  • concurrent sourcing
  • insourcing
  • mixed strategy
  • parallel production
  • taper integration

Cite this

Nordigarden, Daniel ; Rehme, Jakob ; Brege, Staffan ; Chicksand, Daniel ; Walker, Helen. / Outsourcing decisions : the case of parallel production. In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2014 ; Vol. 34, No. 8. pp. 974-1002.
@article{e077dce7f0234890bc06c8ea61e19c9b,
title = "Outsourcing decisions: the case of parallel production",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate an underexplored aspect of outsourcing involving a mixed strategy in which parallel production is continued in-house at the same time as outsourcing occurs.Design/methodology/approach – The study applied a multiple case study approach and drew on qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews with wood product manufacturing companies.Findings – The paper posits that there should be a variety of mixed strategies between the two governance forms of “make” or “buy.” In order to address how companies should consider the extent to which they outsource, the analysis was structured around two ends of a continuum: in-house dominance or outsourcing dominance. With an in-house-dominant strategy, outsourcing complements an organization's own production to optimize capacity utilization and outsource less cost-efficient production, or is used as a tool to learn how to outsource. With an outsourcing-dominant strategy, in-house production helps maintain complementary competencies and avoids lock-in risk.Research limitations/implications – This paper takes initial steps toward an exploration of different mixed strategies. Additional research is required to understand the costs of different mixed strategies compared with insourcing and outsourcing, and to study parallel production from a supplier viewpoint.Practical implications – This paper suggests that managers should think twice before rushing to a “me too” outsourcing strategy in which in-house capacities are completely closed. It is important to take a dynamic view of outsourcing that maintains a mixed strategy as an option, particularly in situations that involve an underdeveloped supplier market and/or as a way to develop resources over the long term.Originality/value – The concept of combining both “make” and “buy” is not new. However, little if any research has focussed explicitly on exploring the variety of different types of mixed strategies that exist on the continuum between insourcing and outsourcing.",
keywords = "outsourcing, concurrent sourcing, insourcing, mixed strategy, parallel production, taper integration",
author = "Daniel Nordigarden and Jakob Rehme and Staffan Brege and Daniel Chicksand and Helen Walker",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1108/IJOPM-06-2012-0230",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "974--1002",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "8",

}

Outsourcing decisions : the case of parallel production. / Nordigarden, Daniel; Rehme, Jakob; Brege, Staffan; Chicksand, Daniel; Walker, Helen.

In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 34, No. 8, 31.12.2014, p. 974-1002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outsourcing decisions

T2 - the case of parallel production

AU - Nordigarden, Daniel

AU - Rehme, Jakob

AU - Brege, Staffan

AU - Chicksand, Daniel

AU - Walker, Helen

PY - 2014/12/31

Y1 - 2014/12/31

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate an underexplored aspect of outsourcing involving a mixed strategy in which parallel production is continued in-house at the same time as outsourcing occurs.Design/methodology/approach – The study applied a multiple case study approach and drew on qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews with wood product manufacturing companies.Findings – The paper posits that there should be a variety of mixed strategies between the two governance forms of “make” or “buy.” In order to address how companies should consider the extent to which they outsource, the analysis was structured around two ends of a continuum: in-house dominance or outsourcing dominance. With an in-house-dominant strategy, outsourcing complements an organization's own production to optimize capacity utilization and outsource less cost-efficient production, or is used as a tool to learn how to outsource. With an outsourcing-dominant strategy, in-house production helps maintain complementary competencies and avoids lock-in risk.Research limitations/implications – This paper takes initial steps toward an exploration of different mixed strategies. Additional research is required to understand the costs of different mixed strategies compared with insourcing and outsourcing, and to study parallel production from a supplier viewpoint.Practical implications – This paper suggests that managers should think twice before rushing to a “me too” outsourcing strategy in which in-house capacities are completely closed. It is important to take a dynamic view of outsourcing that maintains a mixed strategy as an option, particularly in situations that involve an underdeveloped supplier market and/or as a way to develop resources over the long term.Originality/value – The concept of combining both “make” and “buy” is not new. However, little if any research has focussed explicitly on exploring the variety of different types of mixed strategies that exist on the continuum between insourcing and outsourcing.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate an underexplored aspect of outsourcing involving a mixed strategy in which parallel production is continued in-house at the same time as outsourcing occurs.Design/methodology/approach – The study applied a multiple case study approach and drew on qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews with wood product manufacturing companies.Findings – The paper posits that there should be a variety of mixed strategies between the two governance forms of “make” or “buy.” In order to address how companies should consider the extent to which they outsource, the analysis was structured around two ends of a continuum: in-house dominance or outsourcing dominance. With an in-house-dominant strategy, outsourcing complements an organization's own production to optimize capacity utilization and outsource less cost-efficient production, or is used as a tool to learn how to outsource. With an outsourcing-dominant strategy, in-house production helps maintain complementary competencies and avoids lock-in risk.Research limitations/implications – This paper takes initial steps toward an exploration of different mixed strategies. Additional research is required to understand the costs of different mixed strategies compared with insourcing and outsourcing, and to study parallel production from a supplier viewpoint.Practical implications – This paper suggests that managers should think twice before rushing to a “me too” outsourcing strategy in which in-house capacities are completely closed. It is important to take a dynamic view of outsourcing that maintains a mixed strategy as an option, particularly in situations that involve an underdeveloped supplier market and/or as a way to develop resources over the long term.Originality/value – The concept of combining both “make” and “buy” is not new. However, little if any research has focussed explicitly on exploring the variety of different types of mixed strategies that exist on the continuum between insourcing and outsourcing.

KW - outsourcing

KW - concurrent sourcing

KW - insourcing

KW - mixed strategy

KW - parallel production

KW - taper integration

UR - https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2012-0230

U2 - 10.1108/IJOPM-06-2012-0230

DO - 10.1108/IJOPM-06-2012-0230

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 974

EP - 1002

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 8

ER -