Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct.

C. Antaki, Emma Richardson, E. Stokoe, S. Willott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reporting sexual assault to the authorities is fraught with difficulties, and these are compounded when the complainant is hindered by an intellectual disability (ID). In a study of 19 U.K. police interviews with complainants with ID alleging sexual assault and rape, we found that most interviewing officers on occasion pursued lines of questioning which not only probed inconsistencies (which is mandated by their guidelines), but implicitly questioned complainants’ conduct (which is not). We detail two main conversational practices which imply disbelief and disapproval of the complainants’ accounts and behaviour, and whose pragmatic entailments may pose problems for complainants with ID. Such practices probably emerge from interviewers’ foreshadowing of the challenges likely to be made in court by defence counsel. As a policy recommendation, we suggest providing early explanation for the motivation for such questioning, and avoiding certain question formats (especially how come you did X? and why didn't you do Y?).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)328-350
JournalJournal of Sociolinguistics
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

assault
police
disability
interview
rape
pragmatics
Sexual Assault
Intellectual Disability
Questioning
Inconsistency
Police Interview

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Antaki, C. , Richardson, E. , Stokoe, E. and Willott, S. (2015), Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct. J Sociolinguistics, 19: 328-350, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12124.  This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

Cite this

@article{328f3008fc4e413f93fb8f591c0d0f9e,
title = "Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct.",
abstract = "Reporting sexual assault to the authorities is fraught with difficulties, and these are compounded when the complainant is hindered by an intellectual disability (ID). In a study of 19 U.K. police interviews with complainants with ID alleging sexual assault and rape, we found that most interviewing officers on occasion pursued lines of questioning which not only probed inconsistencies (which is mandated by their guidelines), but implicitly questioned complainants’ conduct (which is not). We detail two main conversational practices which imply disbelief and disapproval of the complainants’ accounts and behaviour, and whose pragmatic entailments may pose problems for complainants with ID. Such practices probably emerge from interviewers’ foreshadowing of the challenges likely to be made in court by defence counsel. As a policy recommendation, we suggest providing early explanation for the motivation for such questioning, and avoiding certain question formats (especially how come you did X? and why didn't you do Y?).",
author = "C. Antaki and Emma Richardson and E. Stokoe and S. Willott",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Antaki, C. , Richardson, E. , Stokoe, E. and Willott, S. (2015), Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct. J Sociolinguistics, 19: 328-350, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12124.  This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1111/josl.12124",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "328--350",
journal = "Journal of Sociolinguistics",
issn = "1360-6441",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct. / Antaki, C.; Richardson, Emma; Stokoe, E.; Willott, S.

In: Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 19, No. 3, 22.07.2015, p. 328-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct.

AU - Antaki, C.

AU - Richardson, Emma

AU - Stokoe, E.

AU - Willott, S.

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Antaki, C. , Richardson, E. , Stokoe, E. and Willott, S. (2015), Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct. J Sociolinguistics, 19: 328-350, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12124.  This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

PY - 2015/7/22

Y1 - 2015/7/22

N2 - Reporting sexual assault to the authorities is fraught with difficulties, and these are compounded when the complainant is hindered by an intellectual disability (ID). In a study of 19 U.K. police interviews with complainants with ID alleging sexual assault and rape, we found that most interviewing officers on occasion pursued lines of questioning which not only probed inconsistencies (which is mandated by their guidelines), but implicitly questioned complainants’ conduct (which is not). We detail two main conversational practices which imply disbelief and disapproval of the complainants’ accounts and behaviour, and whose pragmatic entailments may pose problems for complainants with ID. Such practices probably emerge from interviewers’ foreshadowing of the challenges likely to be made in court by defence counsel. As a policy recommendation, we suggest providing early explanation for the motivation for such questioning, and avoiding certain question formats (especially how come you did X? and why didn't you do Y?).

AB - Reporting sexual assault to the authorities is fraught with difficulties, and these are compounded when the complainant is hindered by an intellectual disability (ID). In a study of 19 U.K. police interviews with complainants with ID alleging sexual assault and rape, we found that most interviewing officers on occasion pursued lines of questioning which not only probed inconsistencies (which is mandated by their guidelines), but implicitly questioned complainants’ conduct (which is not). We detail two main conversational practices which imply disbelief and disapproval of the complainants’ accounts and behaviour, and whose pragmatic entailments may pose problems for complainants with ID. Such practices probably emerge from interviewers’ foreshadowing of the challenges likely to be made in court by defence counsel. As a policy recommendation, we suggest providing early explanation for the motivation for such questioning, and avoiding certain question formats (especially how come you did X? and why didn't you do Y?).

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/josl.12124

U2 - 10.1111/josl.12124

DO - 10.1111/josl.12124

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 328

EP - 350

JO - Journal of Sociolinguistics

JF - Journal of Sociolinguistics

SN - 1360-6441

IS - 3

ER -