Reforming damages for misrepresentation: the case for coherent aims and principles

Jill Poole, James Devenney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Examines the basis on which damages for misrepresentation are awarded, suggesting that the underlying principles lack coherence, and calls for clarification of the law. Argues that there are valid policy considerations justifying a distinction between the basis of the award of damages for fraudulent misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation. Explains why identification of the three stages in the process of awarding damages for misrepresentation are crucial to the application of the underlying legal principles of causation and remoteness at the right stage of the process. Reviews case law on lost opportunity damages for fraudulent misrepresentation, the application of loss of chance principles, and recovery of post-contract losses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-305
Number of pages37
JournalJournal of Business Law
VolumeMay
Publication statusPublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

damages
case law
Law
lack

Keywords

  • fraud
  • laws and legislation
  • legal decisions
  • legal principles
  • misrepresentation
  • negligence
  • damages
  • loss of chance
  • loss of profits
  • public policy

Cite this

@article{2236cb159e2c445facc3dc90c587673c,
title = "Reforming damages for misrepresentation: the case for coherent aims and principles",
abstract = "Examines the basis on which damages for misrepresentation are awarded, suggesting that the underlying principles lack coherence, and calls for clarification of the law. Argues that there are valid policy considerations justifying a distinction between the basis of the award of damages for fraudulent misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation. Explains why identification of the three stages in the process of awarding damages for misrepresentation are crucial to the application of the underlying legal principles of causation and remoteness at the right stage of the process. Reviews case law on lost opportunity damages for fraudulent misrepresentation, the application of loss of chance principles, and recovery of post-contract losses.",
keywords = "fraud, laws and legislation, legal decisions, legal principles, misrepresentation, negligence, damages, loss of chance, loss of profits, public policy",
author = "Jill Poole and James Devenney",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "May",
pages = "269--305",
journal = "Journal of Business Law",
issn = "0021-9460",

}

Reforming damages for misrepresentation : the case for coherent aims and principles. / Poole, Jill; Devenney, James.

In: Journal of Business Law, Vol. May, 05.2007, p. 269-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reforming damages for misrepresentation

T2 - the case for coherent aims and principles

AU - Poole, Jill

AU - Devenney, James

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Examines the basis on which damages for misrepresentation are awarded, suggesting that the underlying principles lack coherence, and calls for clarification of the law. Argues that there are valid policy considerations justifying a distinction between the basis of the award of damages for fraudulent misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation. Explains why identification of the three stages in the process of awarding damages for misrepresentation are crucial to the application of the underlying legal principles of causation and remoteness at the right stage of the process. Reviews case law on lost opportunity damages for fraudulent misrepresentation, the application of loss of chance principles, and recovery of post-contract losses.

AB - Examines the basis on which damages for misrepresentation are awarded, suggesting that the underlying principles lack coherence, and calls for clarification of the law. Argues that there are valid policy considerations justifying a distinction between the basis of the award of damages for fraudulent misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation. Explains why identification of the three stages in the process of awarding damages for misrepresentation are crucial to the application of the underlying legal principles of causation and remoteness at the right stage of the process. Reviews case law on lost opportunity damages for fraudulent misrepresentation, the application of loss of chance principles, and recovery of post-contract losses.

KW - fraud

KW - laws and legislation

KW - legal decisions

KW - legal principles

KW - misrepresentation

KW - negligence

KW - damages

KW - loss of chance

KW - loss of profits

KW - public policy

M3 - Article

VL - May

SP - 269

EP - 305

JO - Journal of Business Law

JF - Journal of Business Law

SN - 0021-9460

ER -