Rhetoric in organized anarchies

Duncan Shaw, Paula Jarzabkowski, John A.A. Sillince

Research output: Unpublished contribution to conferenceUnpublished Conference Paperpeer-review


This empirical case study of a business school internationalisation process investigates the relationship between rhetoric, ambiguity and strategic action in a garbage can context. Our data showed that rhetoric structured the garbage can and reduced the randomness of the strategy-making process in two ways. First, rhetoric enabled actors to distinguish between two uses of ambiguity - maximising ambiguity to avoid action, and minimising ambiguity to enact action. Rhetorics that maximised ambiguity were most frequent at the start of the strategy process; rhetorics that minimised ambiguity were most common later in the strategy process. Second, rhetoric provided structure by linking solutions, problems and participants to choice opportunities to enable action and by negating links between solutions, problems and participants and choice opportunities in order to enable inaction.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Event4th organization studies summer workshop - Pissouri, Cyprus
Duration: 5 Jun 20087 Jun 2008


Workshop4th organization studies summer workshop
OtherEmbracing Complexity: Advancing Ecological Understanding in Organization Studies?


Dive into the research topics of 'Rhetoric in organized anarchies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this