Self-reported Side-effects of Ultraviolet-C Disinfection Devices

Zoe Adams*, Christos Bechlivanidis, Magda Osman, John O'Hagan, Dzhordzhio Naldzhiev

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic increased sales of portable UV-C devices as a means of inactivating the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Research suggests that excessive UV-C exposure to the eyes and skin can lead to side-effects, primarily photokeratitis and erythema, but these findings are limited to case studies. This study explores self-reported side-effects of UV-C devices by collating five waves of UK consumer survey data from April 2020–December 2021 (N = 26 864). 30%–46% of owners report a side-effect after using a device claiming to emit UV-C. However, detailed analysis of Wave 4 data (N = 309) highlights inconsistencies between reported and plausible side-effect(s) associated with skin or eye exposure from UV-C devices. Alternative explanations are considered, namely that the reported side-effect(s) were psychosomatic or misattributed to direct exposure of UV-C radiation. Data regarding awareness of warnings about device side-effect(s) supports the misattribution explanation. For risk assessment purposes, limited reliable information about specific irritation or injury to the eye and skin was found from self-reporting surveys. To optimize future data collection, we recommend addressing recall errors by: reducing the period under investigation, supplementing responses with empirical measures, and incentivizing respondents to provide accurate information about the make and model of the UV-C device.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1299-1309
Number of pages11
JournalPhotochemistry and Photobiology
Volume99
Issue number5
Early online date19 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-reported Side-effects of Ultraviolet-C Disinfection Devices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this