Sovereign myths in International Relations: Sovereignty as equality and the reproduction of Eurocentric blindness

Xavier Mathieu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The concept of sovereignty still generates a considerable amount of debate in the discipline of International Relations. Using myth as a heuristic device, I argue that part of this confusion results from a mythical understanding of ‘sovereignty as equality’. Following the myth, sovereignty is seen as playing an equalising role in international relations while international inequalities are depicted as existing despite the norm of sovereignty (and not as a result of it). The myth of sovereignty as equality thus enables IR scholars to separate the inequalities instituted and legitimised by sovereignty from the concept itself. As a consequence, sovereignty is considered as normatively desirable since it is the best tool to offset inequalities. This article argues that the myth rests on three interlinked building blocks and that its maintenance can be explained by its normative appeal (more than by its dubious analytical value). Indeed, even those scholars who reproduce the myth acknowledge that international relations do not conform to it. As such, an effective critique of sovereignty requires both factual disproval (to reveal what the myth contributes to hide) and the construction of an alternative, more desirable myth.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of International Political Theory
Early online date11 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Dec 2018

Bibliographical note

© Sage 2018. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1755088218814072

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sovereign myths in International Relations: Sovereignty as equality and the reproduction of Eurocentric blindness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this