Supply management: is it a discipline?

C.M. Harland, R.C. Lamming, H. Walker, W.E. Phillips, N.D. Caldwell, T.E. Johnsen, L.A. Knight, J. Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose – To examine management literature for guidance on what constitutes a discipline. To examine supply management publications to determine whether the field constitutes a discipline or an emerging discipline. To contribute a structured evaluation to the body of supply management theory/discipline development knowledge.
Design/methodology/approach – Literature review of what constitutes a discipline and an initial assessment of whether supply management is a discipline. Development of research questions used to design tests, using combinations of qualitative pattern matching, journal quality rankings, and social science citations index impact factor. Application of the tests, to evaluate field coherence, quality and the existence of a discipline-debate, to determine whether supply management is an emerging discipline.
Findings – An initial literature review finds supply management not to be a discipline, as the field lacks quality of theoretical development and discussion, and coherence. Tests for increasing evidence of coherence, quality and impact yield positive results, indicating that supply management is progressing in its theoretical development. The test findings combined with the existence of the start of a discipline-debate indicate that supply management should be judged to be an emerging discipline.
Originality/value – Drawing from the management literature, the paper provides a unique structured evaluation of the field of supply management, finding it not to be a discipline, but showing evidence of being an emerging discipline.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)730-753
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Operations and Production Management
Volume26
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2006

Fingerprint

Supply management
Social sciences
Pattern matching
Literature review
Evaluation
Management theory
Impact factor
Ranking
Design methodology
Journal quality
Knowledge development
Citation index
Guidance

Keywords

  • supply chain management
  • suppliers
  • supplier relations

Cite this

Harland, C. M., Lamming, R. C., Walker, H., Phillips, W. E., Caldwell, N. D., Johnsen, T. E., ... Zheng, J. (2006). Supply management: is it a discipline? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(7), 730-753. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610672211
Harland, C.M. ; Lamming, R.C. ; Walker, H. ; Phillips, W.E. ; Caldwell, N.D. ; Johnsen, T.E. ; Knight, L.A. ; Zheng, J. / Supply management : is it a discipline?. In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2006 ; Vol. 26, No. 7. pp. 730-753.
@article{6b79176b9bd14acc9db5a506bfc71119,
title = "Supply management: is it a discipline?",
abstract = "Purpose – To examine management literature for guidance on what constitutes a discipline. To examine supply management publications to determine whether the field constitutes a discipline or an emerging discipline. To contribute a structured evaluation to the body of supply management theory/discipline development knowledge.Design/methodology/approach – Literature review of what constitutes a discipline and an initial assessment of whether supply management is a discipline. Development of research questions used to design tests, using combinations of qualitative pattern matching, journal quality rankings, and social science citations index impact factor. Application of the tests, to evaluate field coherence, quality and the existence of a discipline-debate, to determine whether supply management is an emerging discipline.Findings – An initial literature review finds supply management not to be a discipline, as the field lacks quality of theoretical development and discussion, and coherence. Tests for increasing evidence of coherence, quality and impact yield positive results, indicating that supply management is progressing in its theoretical development. The test findings combined with the existence of the start of a discipline-debate indicate that supply management should be judged to be an emerging discipline.Originality/value – Drawing from the management literature, the paper provides a unique structured evaluation of the field of supply management, finding it not to be a discipline, but showing evidence of being an emerging discipline.",
keywords = "supply chain management, suppliers, supplier relations",
author = "C.M. Harland and R.C. Lamming and H. Walker and W.E. Phillips and N.D. Caldwell and T.E. Johnsen and L.A. Knight and J. Zheng",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1108/01443570610672211",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "730--753",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "7",

}

Harland, CM, Lamming, RC, Walker, H, Phillips, WE, Caldwell, ND, Johnsen, TE, Knight, LA & Zheng, J 2006, 'Supply management: is it a discipline?', International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 730-753. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610672211

Supply management : is it a discipline? / Harland, C.M.; Lamming, R.C.; Walker, H.; Phillips, W.E.; Caldwell, N.D.; Johnsen, T.E.; Knight, L.A.; Zheng, J.

In: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 26, No. 7, 07.2006, p. 730-753.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supply management

T2 - is it a discipline?

AU - Harland, C.M.

AU - Lamming, R.C.

AU - Walker, H.

AU - Phillips, W.E.

AU - Caldwell, N.D.

AU - Johnsen, T.E.

AU - Knight, L.A.

AU - Zheng, J.

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - Purpose – To examine management literature for guidance on what constitutes a discipline. To examine supply management publications to determine whether the field constitutes a discipline or an emerging discipline. To contribute a structured evaluation to the body of supply management theory/discipline development knowledge.Design/methodology/approach – Literature review of what constitutes a discipline and an initial assessment of whether supply management is a discipline. Development of research questions used to design tests, using combinations of qualitative pattern matching, journal quality rankings, and social science citations index impact factor. Application of the tests, to evaluate field coherence, quality and the existence of a discipline-debate, to determine whether supply management is an emerging discipline.Findings – An initial literature review finds supply management not to be a discipline, as the field lacks quality of theoretical development and discussion, and coherence. Tests for increasing evidence of coherence, quality and impact yield positive results, indicating that supply management is progressing in its theoretical development. The test findings combined with the existence of the start of a discipline-debate indicate that supply management should be judged to be an emerging discipline.Originality/value – Drawing from the management literature, the paper provides a unique structured evaluation of the field of supply management, finding it not to be a discipline, but showing evidence of being an emerging discipline.

AB - Purpose – To examine management literature for guidance on what constitutes a discipline. To examine supply management publications to determine whether the field constitutes a discipline or an emerging discipline. To contribute a structured evaluation to the body of supply management theory/discipline development knowledge.Design/methodology/approach – Literature review of what constitutes a discipline and an initial assessment of whether supply management is a discipline. Development of research questions used to design tests, using combinations of qualitative pattern matching, journal quality rankings, and social science citations index impact factor. Application of the tests, to evaluate field coherence, quality and the existence of a discipline-debate, to determine whether supply management is an emerging discipline.Findings – An initial literature review finds supply management not to be a discipline, as the field lacks quality of theoretical development and discussion, and coherence. Tests for increasing evidence of coherence, quality and impact yield positive results, indicating that supply management is progressing in its theoretical development. The test findings combined with the existence of the start of a discipline-debate indicate that supply management should be judged to be an emerging discipline.Originality/value – Drawing from the management literature, the paper provides a unique structured evaluation of the field of supply management, finding it not to be a discipline, but showing evidence of being an emerging discipline.

KW - supply chain management

KW - suppliers

KW - supplier relations

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1558415

U2 - 10.1108/01443570610672211

DO - 10.1108/01443570610672211

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 730

EP - 753

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 7

ER -

Harland CM, Lamming RC, Walker H, Phillips WE, Caldwell ND, Johnsen TE et al. Supply management: is it a discipline? International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2006 Jul;26(7):730-753. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610672211