TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainability of bioenergy – Mapping the risks & benefits to inform future bioenergy systems
AU - Welfle, Andrew James
AU - Almena, Alberto
AU - Arshad, Muhammad Naveed
AU - Banks, Scott William
AU - Butnar, Isabela
AU - Chong, Katie Jane
AU - Cooper, Samuel J.G.
AU - Daly, Helen
AU - Garcia Freites, Samira
AU - Güleç, Fatih
AU - Hardacre, Christopher
AU - Holland, Robert
AU - Lan, Lan
AU - Lee, Chai Siah
AU - Robertson, Peter
AU - Rowe, Rebecca
AU - Shepherd, Anita
AU - Skillen, Nathan
AU - Tedesco, Silvia
AU - Thornley, Patricia
AU - Verdía Barbará, Pedro
AU - Watson, Ian
AU - Williams, Orla Sioned Aine
AU - Röder, Mirjam
N1 - Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Bioenergy is widely included in energy strategies for its GHG mitigation potential. Bioenergy technologies will likely have to be deployed at scale to meet decarbonisation targets, and consequently biomass will have to be increasingly grown/mobilised. Sustainability risks associated with bioenergy may intensify with increasing deployment and where feedstocks are sourced through international trade. This research applies the Bioeconomy Sustainability Indicator Model (BSIM) to map and analyse the performance of bioenergy across 126 sustainability issues, evaluating 16 bioenergy case studies that reflect the breadth of biomass resources, technologies, energy vectors and bio-products. The research finds common trends in sustainability performance across projects that can inform bioenergy policy and decision making. Potential sustainability benefits are identified for People (jobs, skills, income, energy access); for Development (economy, energy, land utilisation); for Natural Systems (soil, heavy metals), and; for Climate Change (emissions, fuels). Also, consistent trends of sustainability risks where focus is required to ensure the viability of bioenergy projects, including for infrastructure, feedstock mobilisation, techno-economics and carbon stocks. Emission mitigation may be a primary objective for bioenergy, this research finds bioenergy projects can provide potential benefits far beyond emissions - there is an argument for supporting projects based on the ecosystem services and/or economic stimulation they may deliver. Also given the broad dynamics and characteristics of bioenergy projects, a rigid approach of assessing sustainability may be incompatible. Awarding ‘credit’ across a broader range of sustainability indicators in addition to requiring minimum performances in key areas, may be more effective at ensuring bioenergy sustainability.
AB - Bioenergy is widely included in energy strategies for its GHG mitigation potential. Bioenergy technologies will likely have to be deployed at scale to meet decarbonisation targets, and consequently biomass will have to be increasingly grown/mobilised. Sustainability risks associated with bioenergy may intensify with increasing deployment and where feedstocks are sourced through international trade. This research applies the Bioeconomy Sustainability Indicator Model (BSIM) to map and analyse the performance of bioenergy across 126 sustainability issues, evaluating 16 bioenergy case studies that reflect the breadth of biomass resources, technologies, energy vectors and bio-products. The research finds common trends in sustainability performance across projects that can inform bioenergy policy and decision making. Potential sustainability benefits are identified for People (jobs, skills, income, energy access); for Development (economy, energy, land utilisation); for Natural Systems (soil, heavy metals), and; for Climate Change (emissions, fuels). Also, consistent trends of sustainability risks where focus is required to ensure the viability of bioenergy projects, including for infrastructure, feedstock mobilisation, techno-economics and carbon stocks. Emission mitigation may be a primary objective for bioenergy, this research finds bioenergy projects can provide potential benefits far beyond emissions - there is an argument for supporting projects based on the ecosystem services and/or economic stimulation they may deliver. Also given the broad dynamics and characteristics of bioenergy projects, a rigid approach of assessing sustainability may be incompatible. Awarding ‘credit’ across a broader range of sustainability indicators in addition to requiring minimum performances in key areas, may be more effective at ensuring bioenergy sustainability.
KW - Biomass
KW - Indicators
KW - Modelling
KW - Policy
KW - Sustainable
KW - Trends
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953423002180
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85167984719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106919
DO - 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106919
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85167984719
SN - 0961-9534
VL - 177
JO - Biomass and Bioenergy
JF - Biomass and Bioenergy
M1 - 106919
ER -