Tablet App halometer for the assessment of dysphotopsia

Phillip J. Buckhurst, Shehzad A. Naroo, Leon N. Davies, Sunil Shah, Hetal Buckhurst, Alec Kingsnorth, Tom Drew, James S. Wolffsohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose To assess the validity and repeatability of the Aston Halometer. Setting University clinic, United Kingdom. Design Prospective, repeated-measures experimental study. Methods The halometer comprises a bright light-emitting-diode (LED) glare source in the center of an iPad4. Letters subtending 0.21° (∼0.3 logMAR) were moved centrifugally from the LED in 0.05 degree steps in 8 orientations separated by 45 degrees for each of 4 contrast levels (1000, 500, 100, and 25 Weber contrast units [Cw]) in random order. Bangerter occlusion foils were inserted in front of the right eye to simulate monocular glare conditions in 20 subjects (mean age 27.7 ± 3.1 years). Subjects were positioned 2 meters from the screen in a dark room with the iPad controlled from an iPhone via Bluetooth operated by the researcher. The C-Quant straylight meter was also used with each of the foils to measure the level of straylight over the retina. Halometry and straylight repeatability was assessed at a second visit. Results Halo size increased with the different occlusion foils and target contrasts (F = 29.564, P <.001) as expected and in a pattern similar to straylight measures (F = 80.655, P <0.001). Lower contrast letters showed better sensitivity but larger glare-obscured areas, resulting in ceiling effects caused by the screen's field-of-view, with 500 Cw being the best compromise. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of the Aston Halometer was good (500Cw: 0.84 to 0.93 and 0.53 to 0.73) and similar to the straylight meter. Conclusion The halometer provides a sensitive, repeatable way of quantifying a patient-recognized form of disability glare in multiple orientations to add objectivity to subjectively reported discomfort glare.

LanguageEnglish
Pages2424-2429
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume41
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Glare
Tablets
Light
Retina
Research Personnel

Cite this

Buckhurst, Phillip J. ; Naroo, Shehzad A. ; Davies, Leon N. ; Shah, Sunil ; Buckhurst, Hetal ; Kingsnorth, Alec ; Drew, Tom ; Wolffsohn, James S. / Tablet App halometer for the assessment of dysphotopsia. In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 11. pp. 2424-2429.
@article{e2a62291822a488e8bd8054ee01a7f4a,
title = "Tablet App halometer for the assessment of dysphotopsia",
abstract = "Purpose To assess the validity and repeatability of the Aston Halometer. Setting University clinic, United Kingdom. Design Prospective, repeated-measures experimental study. Methods The halometer comprises a bright light-emitting-diode (LED) glare source in the center of an iPad4. Letters subtending 0.21° (∼0.3 logMAR) were moved centrifugally from the LED in 0.05 degree steps in 8 orientations separated by 45 degrees for each of 4 contrast levels (1000, 500, 100, and 25 Weber contrast units [Cw]) in random order. Bangerter occlusion foils were inserted in front of the right eye to simulate monocular glare conditions in 20 subjects (mean age 27.7 ± 3.1 years). Subjects were positioned 2 meters from the screen in a dark room with the iPad controlled from an iPhone via Bluetooth operated by the researcher. The C-Quant straylight meter was also used with each of the foils to measure the level of straylight over the retina. Halometry and straylight repeatability was assessed at a second visit. Results Halo size increased with the different occlusion foils and target contrasts (F = 29.564, P <.001) as expected and in a pattern similar to straylight measures (F = 80.655, P <0.001). Lower contrast letters showed better sensitivity but larger glare-obscured areas, resulting in ceiling effects caused by the screen's field-of-view, with 500 Cw being the best compromise. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of the Aston Halometer was good (500Cw: 0.84 to 0.93 and 0.53 to 0.73) and similar to the straylight meter. Conclusion The halometer provides a sensitive, repeatable way of quantifying a patient-recognized form of disability glare in multiple orientations to add objectivity to subjectively reported discomfort glare.",
author = "Buckhurst, {Phillip J.} and Naroo, {Shehzad A.} and Davies, {Leon N.} and Sunil Shah and Hetal Buckhurst and Alec Kingsnorth and Tom Drew and Wolffsohn, {James S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.041",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "2424--2429",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

Tablet App halometer for the assessment of dysphotopsia. / Buckhurst, Phillip J.; Naroo, Shehzad A.; Davies, Leon N.; Shah, Sunil; Buckhurst, Hetal; Kingsnorth, Alec; Drew, Tom; Wolffsohn, James S.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 41, No. 11, 11.2015, p. 2424-2429.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tablet App halometer for the assessment of dysphotopsia

AU - Buckhurst, Phillip J.

AU - Naroo, Shehzad A.

AU - Davies, Leon N.

AU - Shah, Sunil

AU - Buckhurst, Hetal

AU - Kingsnorth, Alec

AU - Drew, Tom

AU - Wolffsohn, James S.

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Purpose To assess the validity and repeatability of the Aston Halometer. Setting University clinic, United Kingdom. Design Prospective, repeated-measures experimental study. Methods The halometer comprises a bright light-emitting-diode (LED) glare source in the center of an iPad4. Letters subtending 0.21° (∼0.3 logMAR) were moved centrifugally from the LED in 0.05 degree steps in 8 orientations separated by 45 degrees for each of 4 contrast levels (1000, 500, 100, and 25 Weber contrast units [Cw]) in random order. Bangerter occlusion foils were inserted in front of the right eye to simulate monocular glare conditions in 20 subjects (mean age 27.7 ± 3.1 years). Subjects were positioned 2 meters from the screen in a dark room with the iPad controlled from an iPhone via Bluetooth operated by the researcher. The C-Quant straylight meter was also used with each of the foils to measure the level of straylight over the retina. Halometry and straylight repeatability was assessed at a second visit. Results Halo size increased with the different occlusion foils and target contrasts (F = 29.564, P <.001) as expected and in a pattern similar to straylight measures (F = 80.655, P <0.001). Lower contrast letters showed better sensitivity but larger glare-obscured areas, resulting in ceiling effects caused by the screen's field-of-view, with 500 Cw being the best compromise. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of the Aston Halometer was good (500Cw: 0.84 to 0.93 and 0.53 to 0.73) and similar to the straylight meter. Conclusion The halometer provides a sensitive, repeatable way of quantifying a patient-recognized form of disability glare in multiple orientations to add objectivity to subjectively reported discomfort glare.

AB - Purpose To assess the validity and repeatability of the Aston Halometer. Setting University clinic, United Kingdom. Design Prospective, repeated-measures experimental study. Methods The halometer comprises a bright light-emitting-diode (LED) glare source in the center of an iPad4. Letters subtending 0.21° (∼0.3 logMAR) were moved centrifugally from the LED in 0.05 degree steps in 8 orientations separated by 45 degrees for each of 4 contrast levels (1000, 500, 100, and 25 Weber contrast units [Cw]) in random order. Bangerter occlusion foils were inserted in front of the right eye to simulate monocular glare conditions in 20 subjects (mean age 27.7 ± 3.1 years). Subjects were positioned 2 meters from the screen in a dark room with the iPad controlled from an iPhone via Bluetooth operated by the researcher. The C-Quant straylight meter was also used with each of the foils to measure the level of straylight over the retina. Halometry and straylight repeatability was assessed at a second visit. Results Halo size increased with the different occlusion foils and target contrasts (F = 29.564, P <.001) as expected and in a pattern similar to straylight measures (F = 80.655, P <0.001). Lower contrast letters showed better sensitivity but larger glare-obscured areas, resulting in ceiling effects caused by the screen's field-of-view, with 500 Cw being the best compromise. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of the Aston Halometer was good (500Cw: 0.84 to 0.93 and 0.53 to 0.73) and similar to the straylight meter. Conclusion The halometer provides a sensitive, repeatable way of quantifying a patient-recognized form of disability glare in multiple orientations to add objectivity to subjectively reported discomfort glare.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952884265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.041

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.041

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 2424

EP - 2429

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

T2 - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 11

ER -