TY - JOUR
T1 - Tapes, transcripts and trials
T2 - The routine contamination of police interview evidence
AU - Haworth, Kate J
N1 - Copyright: The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Funding: ESRC
PY - 2018/10/9
Y1 - 2018/10/9
N2 - This article addresses a serious, but currently unacknowledged, problem of evidential consistency regarding police-suspect interview evidence. It sheds light on flaws in current criminal procedure through the lens of linguistics, focusing on key stages of currently accepted practice which fly in the face of what linguists have long known about language. It demonstrates that, in stark contrast to the strict principles of preservation applied to physical evidence, interview data go through significant transformation between their creation in the interview room and their presentation in the courtroom, especially through changes in format between written and spoken text. It argues that, despite the safeguards provided by PACE 1984, there is nonetheless a level of routine distortion and contamination unintentionally built in to the current system of presenting police interviews as evidence in England & Wales.
AB - This article addresses a serious, but currently unacknowledged, problem of evidential consistency regarding police-suspect interview evidence. It sheds light on flaws in current criminal procedure through the lens of linguistics, focusing on key stages of currently accepted practice which fly in the face of what linguists have long known about language. It demonstrates that, in stark contrast to the strict principles of preservation applied to physical evidence, interview data go through significant transformation between their creation in the interview room and their presentation in the courtroom, especially through changes in format between written and spoken text. It argues that, despite the safeguards provided by PACE 1984, there is nonetheless a level of routine distortion and contamination unintentionally built in to the current system of presenting police interviews as evidence in England & Wales.
KW - criminal evidence
KW - Language as evidence
KW - Police interview
KW - ROTI
KW - transcription
KW - Forensic Linguistics
UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1365712718798656
U2 - 10.1177/1365712718798656
DO - 10.1177/1365712718798656
M3 - Article
SN - 1365-7127
VL - 22
SP - 428
EP - 450
JO - The International Journal of Evidence & Proof
JF - The International Journal of Evidence & Proof
IS - 4
ER -