The case for dumb requirements engineering tools

Daniel Berry, Ricardo Gacitua, Peter Sawyer, Sri Fatimah Tjong

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

[Context and Motivation] This paper notes the advanced state of the natural language (NL) processing art and considers four broad categories of tools for processing NL requirements documents. These tools are used in a variety of scenarios. The strength of a tool for a NL processing task is measured by its recall and precision. [Question/Problem] In some scenarios, for some tasks, any tool with less than 100% recall is not helpful and the user may be better off doing the task entirely manually. [Principal Ideas/Results] The paper suggests that perhaps a dumb tool doing an identifiable part of such a task may be better than an intelligent tool trying but failing in unidentifiable ways to do the entire task. [Contribution] Perhaps a new direction is needed in research for RE tools.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRequirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality 18th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2012, Essen, Germany, March 19-22, 2012. Proceedings
PublisherSpringer
Pages211-217
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)978-3-642-28713-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science
PublisherSpringer
Volume7195
ISSN (Print)0302-9743

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The case for dumb requirements engineering tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Berry, D., Gacitua, R., Sawyer, P., & Tjong, S. F. (2012). The case for dumb requirements engineering tools. In Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality 18th International Working Conference, REFSQ 2012, Essen, Germany, March 19-22, 2012. Proceedings (pp. 211-217). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 7195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28714-5_18